LBRY Block Explorer

LBRY Claims • 136762

fe31dd1f3f524773cfd7459f71d1ece444e1accf

Published By
Created On
19 Jun 2021 15:14:58 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
The Possibility of Inquiry: Menos Paradox From Socrates to Sextus
Author: Gail Fine
File Type: pdf
Gail Fine presents an original interpretation of a compelling puzzle in ancient philosophy. Menos Paradox, which is first formulated in Platos Meno, challenges the very possibility of inquiry. Plato replies with the theory of recollection, according to which we all had prenatal knowledge of some range of things, and what we call inquiry involves recollecting what we previously knew he also illustrates this with his famous cross-examination of an untutored slave about a geometry problem, whose solution the slave is able to discover through inquiry. Hence, contrary to the paradox, inquiry is possible after all. Plato is not the only philosopher to grapple with Menos Paradox so too do Aristotle, the Epicureans, the Stoics, and Sextus. How do their various replies compare with one another, and with Platos? How good are any of their replies? In a fascinating fragment preserved in Damascius Commentary on the Phaedo, Plutarch briefly considers these questions (though for obvious chronological reasons he doesnt discuss Sextus). But Fines book is the first full-length systematic treatment of the paradox and responses to it. Among the topics discussed are the nature of knowledge how knowledge differs from mere true belief the nature of inquiry varieties of innatism concepts and meaning the scope and limits of experience. The Possibility of Inquiry will be of interest to anyone interested in ancient epistemology, in ancient philosophy, or in epistemology. **Review The Possibility of Inquiry stands out for its philosophical rigour, attention to detail and unity of purpose. Inquiry on this issue will continue for many more years to come, not least because Fine has given it such a boost. --Phronesis [C]hallenging and thought-provoking.... Fine cares deeply about Menos paradox itself, but she also uses it to illuminate ancient epistemology more broadly. Thus this book should find a wide audience among scholars of ancient philosophy. --Bryn Mawr Classical Review About the Author Gail Fine earned her BA from the University of Michigan, and her PhD from Harvard University. Since 1975, she has been a professor in the Sage School of Philosophy at Cornell University. Since 2008, she has also been a Senior Research Fellow in Merton College, Oxford, and a Visiting Professor of Ancient Philosophy in the University of Oxford. She is the author of On Ideas Aristotles Criticisms of Platos Theory of Forms (Clarendon Press, 1993) of Plato on Knowledge and Forms Selected Essays (Clarendon Press, 2003) and of many articles in various areas of ancient philosophy. She is also the editor of Plato 1 and 2 in the Oxford Readings in Philosophy series (OUP, 1999), and of the Oxford Handbook of Plato (OUP USA, 2008).
Author
Content Type
Unspecified
application/pdf
Language
English
Open in LBRY

More from the publisher

Controlling
SCRIB
Controlling
POLAR
Controlling
HEGEL
Controlling
LACAN
Controlling
DOUBL
Controlling
AGAIN
Controlling
THE R
Controlling
THE S
Controlling
A HIS