A lot is being said, written and even yelled about freedom of speech. Everyone openly advocates on its side, but surprisingly little is done when it is silenced, and yet it happens in many places and cases - in state media, where every elections there is a "chosen-true", in state schools, where every change in the Ministry of Education comes with new, "selected-truths" to encode students, and there may even be a restriction of this freedom in laws that may at any moment impose a muzzle on "non-selected-truths" even to private media. How is it with this freedom of speech, how to define it? > Freedom of speech - the right to publicly express your own views. If this is a possible definition, it is time for another issue - how can the mentioned "express of your own opinions" look like and what can happen later? It can be noticed that following the red arrows and thus many times looping around the diagram, a situation arises where most of the themes of human life can be prohibited .... Big changes often take small steps, unnoticed. Principles and values must be watched. It may turn out that one-time gagging (using the state) of someone really mad, vulgar or simply stupid will give an excuse for further gagging ..... all of us ...