Trump shared his first post since leaving the Oval Office. His account on Gab was active these days, and it came like a ray of hope for his supporters.
https://youtu.be/0I8H_h7LsqM
The former President hasn’t posted anything since Jan.8. Well, he addressed his supporters twice that day. Trump provided a notice that he wouldn’t show up for Joe Biden’s inauguration on Jan. 20. The Trump family left Washington on Inauguration Day. They were gone by the time Joe Biden was sworn into office.
Trump cannot use Twitter anymore. The platform banned him after the Capitol riots. Similar to other social media websites, Twitter banned Trump for “glorifying violence.” The former President accused Twitter of going “further and further in banning free speech.” He also believes that Twitter works with Dems and the Radical Left. This was their way of shutting him down. But, he’s back.
#GoRight News with Peter Boykin
GoRightNews.com
YouTube:
https://youtube.com/peterboykin
Telegram:
https://t.me/realpeterboykin
https://t.me/gorightnews
https://t.me/fucktheleft
https://t.me/magafirstnews
Gab:
https://gab.com/peterboykin
Facebook:
https://Facebook.com/GoRightNewsOfficial
Twitter:
https://Twitter.com/GoRightNews
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0I8H_h7LsqM
The #Qiew is Most Excited to find out who Amy Coney Barrett Ginsburg's Replacement Sexually Assaulted
https://youtu.be/kpYr3VxRAqY
Amy Vivian Coney Barrett (born January 28, 1972)[2][3] is an American lawyer, jurist, and academic who serves as a circuit judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
President Donald Trump nominated Barrett to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals on May 8, 2017, and the Senate confirmed her on October 31, 2017. Before and while serving on the federal bench, she has been a professor of law at Notre Dame Law School, where she has taught civil procedure, constitutional law, and statutory interpretation.[3][4][5][6]
Eleven months after her confirmation to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Barrett was added to Trump's list of potential Supreme Court nominees.[7] On September 26, 2020, Trump nominated Barrett to succeed Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the United States Supreme Court.[8][9]
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_Barrett
https://www.spreaker.com/user/9922149/the-qiew-is-most-excited-to-find-out-who
The #Qiew : When #GaysGoRight Discusses This and more
Website: https://TheQiew.com
Subscribe and share our Podcasts and Videos For More!
Follow us on:
Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC39yovMD8njNL9Tzd_676mA
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/theqiewcom
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/theqiewcom/
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/TheQiewCom/
Telegram:
https://t.me/TheQiewCom
Apple Podcasts:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-qiew-when-the-gays-go-right/id1532663439?uo=4
Spreaker:
https://www.spreaker.com/show/the-qiew-when-the-gays-go-right
Spotify:
spotify:show:3cmpThEwVZN1CAmZvh5AxY
iHeartRadio:
https://www.iheart.com/podcast/966-the-qiew-when-the-gays-go-70981616/
Google Podcasts:
https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuc3ByZWFrZXIuY29tL3Nob3cvNDU0MzY2OS9lcGlzb2Rlcy9mZWVk
Amazon Music / Audible:
https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/53937ada-97f9-4a6b-ab73-5939934ce686/The-Qiew-When-The-Gays-Go-Right
Deezer:
https://www.deezer.com/show/1636742
Podcast Addict:
https://podcastaddict.com/podcast/3072594
Podchaser:
https://www.podchaser.com/podcasts/the-qiew-when-the-gays-go-righ-1392948
JioSaavn:
https://www.jiosaavn.com/shows/The-Qiew-When-The-Gays-Go-Right\/1\/7Fa9MVaxJwQ_
#GoRight For America
#GaysForTrump
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpYr3VxRAqY
FACEBOOK'S DAYS ARE NUMBERED AND HUMANITY CELEBRATED AND CHEERED!!!!
What happens when an unstoppable force hits an immovable object?
In a recent speech in Brussels marking International Data Privacy Day, Apple CEO Tim Cook went on the offensive against Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook. Cook's speech seems to be a direct response to Facebook's recent attack on Apple, in which the world's largest social network took out full-page ads in several newspapers attacking Apple's new privacy changes.
https://youtu.be/JHBvvCJipfE
But what's most fascinating is that Cook took direct aim at Facebook without ever mentioning the company by name.
Just check out the following excerpt:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Technology does not need vast troves of personal data stitched together across dozens of websites and apps in order to succeed. Advertising existed8 and thrived for decades without it, and we're here today because the path of least resistance is rarely the path of wisdom.
"If a business is built on misleading users on data exploitation, on choices that are no choices at all, then it does not deserve our praise. It deserves reform.
"We should not look away from the bigger picture. In a moment of rampant disinformation and conspiracy theories juiced by algorithms, we can no longer turn a blind eye to a theory of technology that says all engagement is good engagement, the longer the better, and all with the goal of collecting as much data as possible.
"Too many are still asking the question 'How much can we get away with?' when they need to be asking 'What are the consequences?'
"What are the consequences of prioritizing conspiracy theories and violent incitement simply because of the high rates of engagement?
"What are the consequences of not just tolerating but rewarding content that undermines public trust in life-saving vaccinations?
"What are the consequences of seeing thousands of users joining extremist groups and then perpetuating an algorithm that recommends even more?
"It is long past time to stop pretending that this approach doesn't come with a cost. A polarization of lost trust, and yes, of violence.
"A social dilemma cannot be allowed to become a social catastrophe."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The fact that Cook doesn't name Facebook somehow increases its impact. Because as you hear Cook's 's speech, you can't help but immediately think of the house that Zuckerberg built.
If you're wondering how Apple and Facebook ended up at odds, you can read more of the details here. But the reality is these two tech giants have been heading toward a major conflict for quite some time.
The problem is that Apple's and Facebook's business philosophies are diametrically opposed to each other.
Apple is a lifestyle brand. And part of the lifestyle A
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHBvvCJipfE
“Our country no longer has a free press. It is a press of suppression. It is a press where the truth will never come out. It is the greatest and most shocking scandal involving a presidential candidate in modern history,” Trump said, later adding, “The media and the Democrat Party lied to the American people to try to steal the election.”
https://youtu.be/HOLyQcylxac
“The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery!”
- Patrick Henry
Every patriotic American can email or call their representatives in the state and federal seats, Senators and Congressmen alike, and demand loudly and clearly that you expect them to support free and honest elections by challenging and rejecting the Electoral Votes from AZ, MI, NM, PA, GA and WI.
This is how we fight for freedom!
This is how we keep our President!
Right the vote!
#GoRight for America
https://www.spreaker.com/user/9922149/what-our-options-are-if-trump-2020-is-st
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOLyQcylxac
Women’s Sports Policy Working Group seeks to straddle both sides of the trans athlete's issue
https://youtu.be/RAnSczr8H-s
In response to President Biden’s executive order, this organization of former athletes pleads with The White House to adopt a ‘science-based’ approach to trans inclusion in sports.
https://www.spreaker.com/user/9922149/do-sports-have-a-trans-women-problem
The #Qiew Tonight
A Part of the #GoRight Network
#GoRight News with Peter Boykin
Website:
https://GoRightNews.com
https://TheQiew.com
YouTube:
https://youtube.com/peterboykin
Telegram:
https://t.me/realpeterboykin
https://t.me/gorightnews
https://t.me/fucktheleft
https://t.me/magafirstnews
Gab:
https://gab.com/peterboykin
Odysee:
https://odysee.com/@PeterBoykin:2
Facebook:
https://Facebook.com/GoRightNewsOfficial
Twitter:
https://Twitter.com/GoRightNews
Support:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/PeterBoykin
https://www.patreon.com/PeterBoykin
https://PayPal.me/MagaFirstNews
Podcast:
Spreaker:
https://www.spreaker.com/show/goright-with-peter-boykin
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAnSczr8H-s
They've toppled a confederate statue in Raleigh North Carolina tonight and attempted to reenact a hanging with it but failed
Why in the hell are the cops standing down to this madness?!!
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Su9Wxj5GuF4
FREE SPEECH ON THE INTERNET HANGS ON SECTION 230 OF THE COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT
WHAT IS SECTION 230 OF THE COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT
Twenty-six words tucked into a 1996 law overhauling telecommunications have allowed companies like Facebook, Twitter and Google to grow into the giants they are today.
https://www.spreaker.com/user/9922149/free-speech-on-the-internet-hangs-on-sec
Free Speech on The Internet Hangs on Section 230 Of the COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT
Under U.S. law, internet companies are generally exempt from liability for the material user's post on their networks.
Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act - itself part of a broader telecom law - provides a legal 'safe harbor' for internet companies.
But Republicans increasingly argue that Twitter, Facebook, and other social media platforms have abused that protection and should lose their immunity - or at least have to earn it by satisfying requirements set by the government.
Section 230 probably can't be easily dismantled. But if it was, the internet as we know it might cease to exist.
Just what is Section 230?
If a news site falsely calls you a swindler, you can sue the publisher for libel. But if someone posts that on Facebook, you can't sue the company - just the person who posted it.
That's thanks to Section 230, which states that 'no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.'
That legal phrase shields companies that can host trillions of messages from being sued into oblivion by anyone who feels wronged by something someone else has posted - whether their complaint is legitimate or not.
Section 230 also allows social platforms to moderate their services by removing posts that, for instance, are obscene or violate the services' own standards, so long as they are acting in 'good faith.'
What happens if Section 230 is limited or goes away?
'I don´t think any of the social media companies would exist in their current forms without Section 230,' Kosseff said. 'They have based their business models on being large platforms for user content.'
There are two possible outcomes:
Platforms might get more cautious.
This outcome could actually hurt none other than the president himself, who routinely attacks private figures, entertains conspiracy theories, and accuses others of crimes.
Another possibility: Facebook, Twitter, and other platforms could abandon moderation altogether and let the lower common denominator prevail.