LBRY Block Explorer

LBRY Claims • 73494

d6b9edc93d8d4bfa1cfa05681468f620112de428

Published By
Created On
7 Feb 2021 22:35:51 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
Gadamer and the Question of Understanding: Between Heidegger and Derrida
Author: Adrian Costache
File Type: pdf
Hans-Georg Gadamer is depicted as a paradoxical figure in the literature. When his work is approached by itself, outside the history of hermeneutics, he is generally presented as the disciple of Martin Heidegger whose main theoretical contribution lies in having transposed his ontological hermeneutics into the sphere of the human sciences. Usually the master-student relation ends with a break between the two brought about by the students desire to become herself a master. In Gadamer and Heideggers case the possibility of such a symbolic parricide has always excluded by the scholarship. When Gadamers work is approached in context, in the history of hermeneutics the position of the literature changes radically and he, not Heidegger, is revered as the central figure of hermeneutic theory in the 20th century, his teachers work s well as those of Friedrich Schleiermacher and Diltheyhis immediate forerunnersbeing regarded as mere preambles to the great hermeneutic theory proposed by Truth and Method. While the works of those following him as addenda or footnotes to it. In most histories and historical introductions, textbooks and anthologies of hermeneutics the texts chosen as indicative for the subsequent development of hermeneutics after Truth and Method are texts relating in a direct manner to Gadamers work if not dedicated explicitly and exclusively to it. The present book aims to dismantle this paradox by showing, on the one hand, that Gadamers translation of Heidegger involved, as he himself says, a series of essential alterations to the original which make philosophical hermeneutics a more coherent and better articulated hermeneutic theory, one offering a more faithful description of the phenomenon of understanding than Heideggers. And, on the other hand, by taking the dossier of the famous encounter between Gadamer and Derrida as its cue, it aims to show that this does nevertheless not mean that it would be an unsurpassable achievement in the field. For, in light of Derridas deconstruction, it becomes apparent that, although necessary, every step forward from Heidegger as well as from Schleiermacher and Dilthey Gadamer takes is problematic in itself. ** Hans-Georg Gadamer is depicted as a paradoxical figure in the literature. When his work is approached by itself, outside the history of hermeneutics, he is generally presented as the disciple of Martin Heidegger whose main theoretical contribution lies in having transposed his ontological hermeneutics into the sphere of the human sciences. Usually the master-student relation ends with a break between the two brought about by the students desire to become herself a master. In Gadamer and Heideggers case the possibility of such a symbolic parricide has always excluded by the scholarship. When Gadamers work is approached in context, in the history of hermeneutics the position of the literature changes radically and he, not Heidegger, is revered as the central figure of hermeneutic theory in the 20th century, his teachers work s well as those of Friedrich Schleiermacher and Diltheyhis immediate forerunnersbeing regarded as mere preambles to the great hermeneutic theory proposed by Truth and Method. While the works of those following him as addenda or footnotes to it. In most histories and historical introductions, textbooks and anthologies of hermeneutics the texts chosen as indicative for the subsequent development of hermeneutics after Truth and Method are texts relating in a direct manner to Gadamers work if not dedicated explicitly and exclusively to it. The present book aims to dismantle this paradox by showing, on the one hand, that Gadamers translation of Heidegger involved, as he himself says, a series of essential alterations to the original which make philosophical hermeneutics a more coherent and better articulated hermeneutic theory, one offering a more faithful description of the phenomenon of understanding than Heideggers. And, on the other hand, by taking the dossier of the famous encounter between Gadamer and Derrida as its cue, it aims to show that this does nevertheless not mean that it would be an unsurpassable achievement in the field. For, in light of Derridas deconstruction, it becomes apparent that, although necessary, every step forward from Heidegger as well as from Schleiermacher and Dilthey Gadamer takes is problematic in itself. **
Author
Content Type
Unspecified
application/pdf
Language
English
Open in LBRY

More from the publisher

Controlling
EMPIR
Controlling
TOP G
Controlling
COMPA
Controlling
WOMEN
Controlling
AN IN
Controlling
FOUND
Controlling
THE D
Controlling
BIPOL
Controlling
URBAN