I think that Teddy loves the existential awe of language but oversees that the public descriptions of essence are essential to description the mechanism of language, as a phenomenon of our existence, matter of factly. The language is the only means to touch "the world" there is not outside or prior to language when pointing to the world, but this doesn't mean that the language does not demonstrably note that which is a pre lingual being, an infant as being alive yet without the sentient abilities of what it is to be conscious of itself. Yet it is there and It, the infant will become what it is not. and it is that which is the phenomenon. The awe of the fact that beasts such as a infant and a child as we once were became what we are today. so how does the language evaporate the existential crisis. without denying that essence comes after existence? Wittgenstein asks us to point to how we already use language to describe human growth & understanding. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsDgpT3XYU8