To become a Partner : www.billstill.com, then Click "Subscribe”.
Several commenters have asked for an update on the DC Madam case. Well, things move slowly in the legal world generally, but there is significant and promising news to report today. Guess who’s blocking the release of the DC Madam’s list now? According to Montgomery Blair Sibley, the lawyer who has possession of the list, the primary holdup to his releasing the 815 names, and addresses of the DC Madam’s clientele is none other than President Obama’s recent Supreme Court nominee, Judge Merrick Garland. [Insert OAN] the 815 names is one of the 3 remaining Republican Presidential candidates. Having been blocked by Judge Garland, on March 28, Sibley filed for a stay of the 9-year-old restraining order with the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, John G. Roberts, Jr. Roberts denied this petition on April 4, but made no comment. A few days later, Sibley resubmitted the same petition to Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, who viewed it more favorably. Sibley’s petition is now scheduled for a conference of the Supremes on April 29 and a call for amicus briefs was put out. The deadline for those was yesterday, April 18. Amicus briefs are legal essays containing additional information the court may find interesting prepared by professional societies, public interest groups or interested parties involved in other cases with similar issues. This is a significant step in Sibley’s battle. According to attorney and author Robert B. Standler: “In recent years, [the] U.S. Supreme Court grants only about 1.5% of the Petitions that the Court receives.” Some have commented that this may only be yet another stall tactic – an attempt to run out the Republican Primary clock. The last Republican primary occurs on June 7th. However, Justice Thomas could have ignored Sibley’s petition, just as the Chief Justice did. Justice Thomas did not have to take this step of support. I’m Still reporting from Washington. Good Day
Two New Yorkers filed papers yesterday in Manhattan Supreme Court asking a court order to keep Ted Cruz of the ballot in the state’s Republican presidential primary on April 19.
When Cruz was born in Canada in 1970, his mother was an American citizen. She was born in Wilmington, Del. His father was a native of Cuba who became a citizen of Canada after Cruz was born.
In court papers, Barry Korman, 81, of Manhattan and William Gallo, 85, of Manhasset say Cruz:
"has publicly admitted that he was born in Canada [and state election law says]"a person shall not be designated or nominated for a public office or party position who is ... ineligible to be elected or ... meet the constitutional or statutory qualifications."
Therefore, they contend, Cruz is "constitutionally ineligible" to become President as per Article II, Section I Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.
I’m still reporting from Washington. Good day.
Support Our Sponsors - Noble Gold & Silver -
https://goo.gl/kx2yzW
Life Change Tea - Rid Your Body From Toxins!
https://www.getthetea.com
Ben Stein, lawyer, actor and economist, blasted the latest ruling of federal court judge Derrick Watson which blocks President Trump’s second immigration order. He appeared on Judge Jeanine’s show, “Justice” on Fox News over the weekend. I had to cut out quite a bit of this interview because part of it confused the basic, brilliant theme of his comments.
[insert]
Stein then goes on to explain the very important but perverse legal concept that is rearing its ugly head here.
[insert]
Stein went to law school at Yale and so he is expertly qualified to explain this brand new legal theory that wipes out centuries of western civilization’s rule of law concept based on centuries of legal precedence. He calls it “legal realism.”
[insert]
This new “legal realism” – you know, where absolute truth and justice are no longer absolutes, and are now replaced by a sliding scale determined by the whim of a single federal judge. This concept will probably fit in nicely with an entirely new form of legal system that our children and grandchildren will have to deal with in the future, but, if I dare to say the name of this legal system, this video would probably be demonetized.
[insert]
This is a scary time we are living in. Will civilization hold fast, or is this humanity’s peak – followed by rapid disintegration into the law of the jungle?
It reminds me of a single line from an obscure 1968 tune called Marie La Peau by a group called Salloom, Sinclair And The Mother Bear. It was an 8-minute-long early version of rap music but just a little less inane. You can still find it on YouTube.
Marie La Peau is the only track worth listening to. It had several memorable lines that for some reason have stuck in my head for all these years, like “the whine of the engine.”
But the most memorable line that is completely relevant to today’s report is: “rapid change with an option on violence.”
This year is a major turning point for what we call civilization. If we submit to the rapid change brought on over the past few years – then we will be tossing aside a couple thousand years of western civilization and we will live out our lives as not-so-happy slaves.
But if we don’t give in – it’s going to be a rough ride from here on in. The freedom that only a few have fought for in the past, now requires a growing sacrifice from a larger percentage of the population if we are to preserve it.
So now, the big treat for those who have stayed to watch this entire report.
This is the final powerful minute of Marie Le Peau which I hadn’t heard for 50 years until this morning.
[insert].
I’m still reporting from Washington. Good day.
Visit our website at http://www.billstill.com
Considered by informed insiders’ as the ultimate resource for surviving economic or financial collapse/crash and attaining the unvarnished truth about the latest US and world news, current events in Washington, and today’s United States political climate. Please Like, Comment & Share.
Good afternoon, I’m still reporting on
Ben Stein on the Decision, 1554
Bill Still is a former newspaper editor and publisher. He has written for USA Today, The Saturday Evening Post, the Los Angeles Times Syndicate, OMNI magazine, and has also produced the syndicated radio program, Health News. He has written 22 books and two documentary videos and is the host of his wildly popular daily YouTube Channel the “Still Report”, the quintessential report on the economy and Washington.
Connect with Bill Still:
https://www.youtube.com/user/bstill3
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+BillStill
http://billstills.blogspot.in/
https://twitter.com/billstill
https://www.facebook.com/TheStillReport
https://www.pinterest.com/billstills/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/billstill
http://billstills.tumblr.com/
https://billstills.wordpress.com/
https://www.diigo.com/profile/billstill
https://www.reddit.com/user/billstills/
http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/billstillss
Consider becoming a cherished sponsor: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=3204630
https://youtu.be/InxEk0wCVWU
The password for the San Bernardino shooter’s ICloud account was mistakenly reset hours after authorities took possession of the device.
The Justice Department acknowledged in its court filing against Apple that Justice had reset the password remotely, but this eliminated the possibility of an auto-backup that would have given the FBI access to the information they seek.
Had this password not been reset, according to Apple, the shooters’ phone could have been backed up to the cloud, once it was put within range of a Wi-Fi network which it had recognized before, like the one in the shooters’ home.
Apple executives say the iPhone in question was in the possession of the government when the password was reset, but the feds initially tried to blame the reset on a county government IT employee, acting on his own.
Apple then produced information proving that federal investigators were indeed in possession of the phone when the reset error occurred.
The revelation tends to muddy the government’s case against Apple. Apple’s CEO, Tim Cook, has vowed to fight the issue to the Supreme Court.
I’m still reporting from Washington. Good day.
As it turns out, Nigel Farage suddenly quit his leadership post at UKIP, the UK Independence Party, because of several death threats posted on social media.
Farage has made a police report to detectives after a flurry of threats to kill him.
In one tweet, a user named “Englands Own” tweeted out:
“I will pay for someone to shoot Nigel Farage.”
In another, a user named “Welshy” said:
“Someone needs to assassinate Nigel Farage with immediate effect.”
These two need to be tracked down because in this age, it’s easier than ever to make and widely distribute such threats over the Internet, and they can have devastating effects on the political process.
Think of it, we do want to retain a process where elected officials are expected to go out at designated times and specific places and expose themselves to the public, don’t we?
If we don’t get a handle on this type of crime and make public examples of these people, all our politicians will soon be living behind television screens and computer monitors with zero access by the public to an event where we can actually shake a real person’s hand.
And further restrictions on guns are not the answer.
As recent ISIS material has made clear to their followers, if you can’t get your hands on a gun, use whatever you can, a knife, a screwdriver, a pressure cooker, or your Ford Explorer.
Farage says he may return to the party if it looks like Britain is getting a “rotten deal” over the Brexit exit, but insists that his time as leader has expired.
I’m Still reporting from Washington. Good Day.
FOR ONE-TIME DONATIONS:
Paypal: billstill3@aol.com
Bitcoin: 15Ucde9jSR7UezG8w4Lgk3jMhiCebc4veG
You still think Donald Trump is a fluke?
This weekend, Europe spoke on the topic of the Muslim invasion in no uncertain terms. In elections in many European nations on Sunday right-leaning, anti-immigration, even anti-Euro and European Union parties have been swept into office in the greatest political shift since World War 2.
In France, in what is being called a “far-Right earthquake”, the anti-immigrant National Front party led by Marine Le Pen took 26% of the vote, pushing the ruling Socialist Party of president François Hollande into third place with under 14% of the vote in regional elections.
Ms. Le Pen and her party made the anti-immigrant message the centerpiece of their campaign, calling for re-establishing European borders – a direct slap in the face to the open-border socialists which have ruled the European Parliament for decades.
Le Pen’s main message was that France cannot take in more Muslim immigrants – a message that is growing stronger even in the United States.
Le Pen’s 40-year-old party has never won before in any French region before. Le Penn will now set her sights on the presidential and legislative elections 18 months from now.
Left-leaning parties across Europe squeeled in painful disbelief Monday morning.
French Prime Minister Manuel Vall called the election:
“a political earthquake in France….
“A very grave moment for France and for Europe.”
Ecology minister Segolene Royale lamented:
“It’s a shock on a global scale.”
A second round of run-off elections will be held in France next Sunday, but the National Front is expected to dominate that election as well.
Across Europe, right-wing parties gained ground in Germany, Austria, Denmark and Greece.
German chancellor Angela Merkel – probably the leader most supportive of the EU’s open border policy - called the results:
“remarkable and regrettable”
In Germany, the Alternative für Deutschland party – or AfD - which wants Germany to stop using the Euro and return to the German Mark, won 6 of Germany’s 96 seats in the European Parliament. This was quite a surprise because this was the AfD’s first year in elections.
Euro-skeptics believe that as the problems with the Euro continue to grow, the AfD is destined to continue to grow.
But the tide has definitely shifted massively in Germany now. Even the ruling German party favors building a fence to put a stop to the Muslim tidal wave from the Middle East and Africa.
In Greece, the anti-Europe Syriza leftist party topped the polls with 26.5% of the vote, and the extreme right Golden Dawn party winning 9.3% of the vote, thereby winning 3 seats in the European Parliament.
In Denmark, the anti-Islam, anti-immigration Danish People’s Party came in first in nationwide elections, winning 27% of the vote.
But it was also election day on another continent in the nation with the world’s largest proven oil reserves – no, not Saudi Arabia, but in South America - Venezuela.
The far left-leaning United Social Party of former communist dictator Hugo Chaves was decimated by the more conservative Democratic Unity Roundtable – or MUD.
Fortunately, the victory was so huge that President Nicolas Maduro took to the airwaves and announced that he accepted the loss and would retire peacefully in early January.
I’m Still reporting from Washington. Good day.
It’s actually quite a similar situation to the situation here in the U.S. for those trying to support Donald Trump. According to the prestigious German newspaper, “Die Welt” (the World), members of the rapidly growing German political party, the Alternative for Germany – or AfD were blocked from attending their party’s conference earlier this year by leftist radicals.
In addition, the party has reported over 800 cases of attacks, including assaults, vandalism, death threats, property damage to homes and party offices and arson of personal vehicles.
At the party conference, left-wing extremists fought with police, leading to hundreds of arrests. The AfD is not considered extremist and therefore do not even warrant any government surveillance.
In the latest revelation, however, at least one of the leftist groups calling on their members to homes “visit” the homes of AfD members, may be getting government money.
The group, called “Welcome Network Pankow Helps” is getting extensive government funding from the German Federal Family Ministry because they advertise on their website that they help migrants find housing in Berlin.
It was on this website that a call went out to block traffic to the dental office of one AfD spokesman. The call to action brought out 60 black bloc anarchists.
The black bloc group appears at protests wearing all-black clothing, sunglasses, ski masks, scarves and/or motorcycle helmets to make them difficult to prosecute. The tactic allows the group to appear as one large unified mass and promotes solidarity. The picture is from a group of black bloc protesters in Washington, D.C. in front of the World Bank.
So the protest tactics are being tested in Germany, than brought over here to keep the leftist agenda moving along.
I’m still reporting from Washington. Good day.
A self-proclaimed ISIS terrorist killed at least 50 and wounded another 53 in the early hours of this morning in Orlando.
But here’s what President Obama had to say about it about 4 pm today:
[insert]
Former CIA Director James Woolsey couldn’t hide his disbelief at Obama’s characterization:
[insert]
It’s not even that facts don’t matter to Obama – it’s that deception is standard operating procedure. Barrack Hessein Obama – that is a Muslim name and Obama is a black Muslim. In fact, according to Egyptian politicians, Obama is a member of the International Muslim Brotherhood – see Still Report #427 – Is Obama a Muslim?
https://youtu.be/M75qSoTS-M8
Islamic terror expert Sabastian Gorka was even more incredulous at Obama’s press brief:
[insert]
However, there is hope out there. Here is what Donald Trump said today on the mass shooting:
“In his remarks today, President Obama disgracefully refused to even say the words 'Radical Islam'. For that reason alone, he should step down. If Hillary Clinton, after this attack, still cannot say the two words 'Radical Islam' she should get out of this race for the Presidency.
If we do not get tough and smart real fast, we are not going to have a country anymore. Because our leaders are weak, I said this was going to happen – and it is only going to get worse. I am trying to save lives and prevent the next terrorist attack. We can't afford to be politically correct anymore.
The terrorist, Omar Mir Saddique Mateen, is the son of an immigrant from Afghanistan who openly published his support for the Afghanistani Taliban and even tried to run for President of Afghanistan. According to Pew, 99% of people in Afghanistan support oppressive Sharia Law.”
“Radical Islam advocates hate for women, gays, Jews, Christians and all Americans. I am going to be a President for all Americans, and I am going to protect and defend all Americans. We are going to make America safe again and great again for everyone.”
To become Partner #462: www.billstill.com, then Click "Subscribe”.
Good morning, I’m Still reporting on the Invasion.
There has been such a flurry of news busting out of Europe as a result of the massive sex attack in Cologne, Germany that I gotten way behind.
For example, the latest tally of women attacked just in Cologne has now risen to over 500 criminal reports to police.
It seems like every nation has been covering up the breadth and depth of the problems that the Muslim invasion has caused; and now that the cat has come out of the bag, there has been an explosion of really disturbing news.
I think there are 3 primary factors involved: those sincerely not wanting to scare the population along with those who are sincerely in sympathy with the plight of the world’s poor.
But I’m convinced that there are those evil few who are deliberately trying to keep it quiet for as long as possible to get as many Muslims in their countries as possible for their own nefarious purposes.
But why do liberals – for example feminists – countenance hushing up illegal immigration of a group that WITHOUT DOUBT has THE most retrograde notions of women’s rights on this planet? Notions that would wipe out all the advances women have made in the last 100 years.
An excellent paper has been produced which explains why and how the far left can possibly have anything in common with Sharia law. My problem it is a very lengthy piece, and I have not had time to synopsize it yet – but it is coming.
British M.P.s are struggling with the invasion problem. They will soon put up for debate what’s being called a “counter extremism” bill for debate in Parliament. It would make it illegal for Islamic extremists to publicly demand that Sharia law replace British law in any way. It would also make it illegal to enforce Sharia law in their own Sharia law courts.
It would also make it illegal for anyone to launch abusive social media attacks against members of the British armed forces. Lately, Muslims have caused a rise of hate messages and death threats against members of the armed forces, just as we see in the United States.
The new counter-extremism bill is part of a strategy to tackle the radicalization of Muslims in the UK, which is quickly getting out of the ability of police to control.
At least 700 Brits have traveled to Syria to join ISIS.
Home Secretary Teresa May says that the extreme Islamist ideology:
“…includes the uncompromising belief that people cannot be Muslim and British, and insists those who do not agree with them are not true Muslims.”
“The overriding principle is these rules, practices and bodies must operate within the rule of law in the UK.”