To become Partner #446: www.billstill.com, then Click "Subscribe”. According to a Russian Foreign Intelligence non-classified report, reported on by Russia Today, a U.S. Admiral has been fired for questioning why the top Navy security and intelligence team was dispatched from Camp David to Dubai an what he termed an: “… Obama house hunting mission.” Apparently, President Obama is in the process of purchasing a $4.9 million dollar seaside villa in Dubai for his retirement. Reportedly a deposit was made on the property last week by the Podesta Group, a global public relations firm. Interestingly, the purchase is being handled by the global law firm DLA Piper, said to be the representatives of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. On Friday, Jan. 8, Rear Admiral Rick Williams sent an email asking why the top US Navy security team was being tasked towards checking out the security implications of the new home. Within 18 hours, Adm. Williams’ boss, Vice Admiral Nora Tyson - acting on direct orders from President Obama - fired Admiral Williams. The justification? “Loss of confidence in his ability to command [because of] allegations of misuse of government computer equipment.” Suddenly, anonymous reports began to circulate in the U.S. that Adm. Williams had been viewing porn on his govt. computer. Having worked in the Pentagon environment, I can state for a fact that this is impossible. These sites have been blocked on govt computers for years and anyone who tries it, gets the infamous red screen of death that can only be unfrozen by the Help Desk – a very embarrassing proposition. In other words, this is a lie! It’s a flimsy cover story and just one more example of Obama’s ruthless cleansing of any military officer that dares to offend him. I’m still reporting from Washington. Good Day.

Visit our website now: http://www.billstill.com - considered by informed insiders’ as THE ultimate resource for fixing the National Debt problem and surviving Economic or Financial Collapse/Crash and attaining the unvarnished truth about Washington and today’s United States Political Climate. Good morning, I’m still reporting on John Bolton – Secretary of State? Yesterday, John Bolton, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, met with President-Elect Donald Trump regarding the position of Secretary of State. I think the general notion of Ambassador Bolton in the MSM is that he is hawkish neocon. I’ve always liked Bolton. He never follows the herd because the depth of his knowledge of international affairs is so deep. His views always take a very nuanced approach. Here’s an example. I came down in support of taking out Saddam Hussein, despite the fact that I knew it would unbalance the entire Middle East. For those of you who weren’t old enough to have followed this on a day-by-day basis, here is a very important perspective that is completely lost from the MSM’s overview of the roots of the war in Iraq. This from Saddam Hussein’s Wikipedia entry: “Saddam was notable for using terror against his own people. The Economist described Saddam as "one of the last of the 20th century's great dictators, but not the least in terms of egotism, or cruelty, or morbid will to power". “Saddam's regime brought about the deaths of at least 250,000 Iraqis and committed war crimes in Iran, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International issued regular reports of widespread imprisonment and torture.” Beyond that, I had met a nurse and a doctor whom had served in Iraq during Saddam’s reign who discovered that Saddam had a very advanced chemical and bio-weapons capability and Saddam was spending lots of money for R&D in this area. The nurse’s name was Joyce Riley – who later went on to host a very successful radio show out of Versailles, Missouri. The doctor’s name was Garth Nicholsen who ended up teaching at a university in San Diego. They documented Saddam’s chemical and bio-weapons capabilities as clearly WMD (weapons of mass destruction). However, the MSM was strangely silent about Riley and Nicholson’s attempts to inform the American public on dangers of this issue. It’s like they were supporting Saddam. As the US Army entered Baghdad, it was clearly reported on Fox by Hannity -- for only one day -- that a convoy of trucks was spotted heading northwest into Syria. The theory is that this was Saddam’s bio-weapons R&D team. This convoy was further supported by Iraqi general Georges Sada in his post-war book, Saddam’s Secrets. General Sada was Vice-Air Marshall of Saddam’s Air Force and made several appearances on Fox talking about an air convoy as well of some 50 sorties taking some sort of heavy equipment into Syria. This, too, is now completely ignored as the narrative is now that there was little justification for invading Iraq in the first place. Interestingly, Gen. Sada was a devout Christian in a Muslim country. So although I was not a huge fan of U.S. intervention, I have always been mystified why this important piece of the puzzle is now totally ignored – and even denied by the MSM. Although it seems clear today that involvement in Iraq was a mistake, what were we supposed to do; support a dictator who ruled by throwing his opponents into trash shredding machines? Here is a picture of the jacket of General Sada’s excellent book; published in 2006 by Integrity Publishers – a small Christian publisher in Brentwood, Tennessee. I apologize for going on about this for two minutes, but it is so rare that I get the opportunity to expose this totally-ignored part of the history of the genesis of the Iraq war. My point is that John Bolton’s support for the Iraq War had significant justification that has been denied over and over again in the MSM as fictitious. Bill Still is a former newspaper editor and publisher. He has written for USA Today, The Saturday Evening Post, the Los Angeles Times Syndicate, OMNI magazine, and has also produced the syndicated radio program, Health News. He has written 22 books and two documentary videos and is the host of his wildly popular daily YouTube Channel the “Still Report”, the quintessential report on the economy and Washington. Connect with Bill Still: https://www.youtube.com/user/bstill3 https://plus.google.com/u/0/+BillStill http://billstills.blogspot.in/ https://twitter.com/billstill https://www.facebook.com/BillStillOfficial https://www.pinterest.com/billstills/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/billstill http://billstills.tumblr.com/ https://billstills.wordpress.com/ https://www.diigo.com/profile/billstill https://www.reddit.com/user/billstills/ http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/billstillss Consider becoming a cherished sponsor: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=3204630 https://youtu.be/HUkamRC1gG0

To become a Partner : www.billstill.com, then Click "Subscribe”. Link to Gordon supercomputer & Facebook: http://phys.org/news/2012-09-gordon-supercomputer-million-person-facebook.html This week, Facebook founder & CEO Mark Zuckerberg denounced the political positions of Donald Trump without mentioning him by name. “I hear fearful voices calling for building walls and distancing people they label as ‘others,’” Zuckerberg said at the company’s annual F8 developer conference. “I hear them calling for blocking free expression, for slowing immigration, for reducing trade, and in some cases, even for cutting access to the internet.” Zuckerberg’s politically-charged comments were seen as unprecedented for a developer’s conference. But behind the somewhat fuzzy political criticism was an internal poll by Facebook employees that was quite specific. Before every Q&A Zuckerberg holds, Facebook employees vote in an internal poll of what questions should be asked of him. One of the questions posted by Facebook employees the day before the March 4, 2016 Q&A was: “What responsibility does Facebook have to help prevent President Trump in 2017?” [insert “Employee Poll” screenshot] More that 1 billion people now use Facebook, and this cycle, politicians will be spending record amounts of money on Facebook advertising. Although many of us somehow expect Facebook to be fair, they don’t have to be, and, in fact, they have not in the past. According to Professo r Eugene Volokh, a UCLA law professor: “Facebook can promote or block any material that it wants. Facebook has the same First Amendment right as the New York Times. They can completely block Trump if they want. They block him or promote him.” Reporter Michael Nunez, writing in Gizmodo added: “With Facebook, we don’t know what we’re not seeing. We don’t … know how that might be affecting how we see the world.” In 2010, Facebook ran a secret experiment on 61 million users to see if they could impact their real-world voting behavior. A research paper later claimed that it worked. Facebook increased voter turnout by over 340,000 people. In 2012, Facebook secretly tampered with the news feeds of 1.9 million users and determined that they can make you feel whatever they want you to feel. “If Facebook decided to, it could gradually remove any pro-Trump stories or media off its site – devastating for a campaign,” wrote Gizmodo author Nunez. “Facebook wouldn’t have to disclose it was doing this, and would be protected by the First Amendment.” The only way Facebook could suffer any legal consequences is if it steps over the line and actually colludes with one particular candidate - to boost Sanders news, for example, and suppress Trump news. According to Robert Drechsel, a professor of journalism ethics at the University of Wisconsin – Madison: “… it would turn an independent expenditure (protected by the First Amendment) into a campaign contribution because it would be coordinated—and that could be restricted.” “But if they’re just saying, ‘We don’t want Trump material on our site,’ they have every right to do that. It’s protected by the First Amendment.” However, Facebook yesterday said that it will never use its platform to influence how people vote. Facebook told the Hill: “Voting is a core value of democracy and we believe that supporting civic participation is an important contribution we can make to the community. We encourage any and all candidates, groups, and voters to use our platform to share their views on the election and debate the issues. I’m Still reporting from Washington. Good day.

Good afternoon, I’m still reporting on the Clintons. Well, it looks like the FBI’s interview with Hillary Clinton did happen this morning. Here is video of her returning to her home in FBI vehicles. But despite my interpretation of former Attorney General Mukasey’s statement the night before where it looked like he was implying that Clinton would be at least recommended for indictment, Judge Jeanine sees it otherwise. Friday morning she made an appearance on Fox and Friends to discuss whether Attorney General Loretta Lynch was stepping aside from the Clinton investigation: [insert] I’m Still reporting from Washington. Good Day.