Published By
Created On
16 Mar 2019 07:22:47 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
OYE NEWS | Does Nobody See What’s Happening Here?
The news right now circulating both the sides of the political spectrum and every fringe community at either side is none other than, Vaccines.
So while the debate to whether Vaccines are safe and effective is an important issue in its own right, the underlying factor here which is more important than the debate itself is censorship.
We seem to have short memories as it was only 6 months ago we had a social media culling of first Alex Jones and his Infowars channels, in a coordinated attack all the well known social media giants removed Jones’ content from their platforms.
Shortly after tens of thousands of content providers were reporting their content and channels had been shut down also, since then a string of voices have been silenced on these platforms and it still continues now, why?
In the case of Alex Jones and the voices that followed it we primarily voices which were speaking against the politically accepted narrative and Conspiracy related content.
As is the case with the current anti-vaccination information take down, the censorship of voices such as Jones was down to pressure from people outside of the platform itself.
So here we are now with a graveyard of dead links on google where content creators have been shut down and hundreds of thousands of content creators adjusting their content to avoid their own demise, though through heavy filtering on their content, specifically on Youtube, their demise could be far more slower and painful death then the likes of Infowars.
But, just as the fun was over and the World was moving on from Infowars we have this witch hunt for anyone who doesn’t follow the state suggested Vaccine Schedule. It was all kicked off by multiple measles outbreaks around the World and an intensive fear campaign being pushed by the pharmaceutical whores such as Paul Offit and his band of merry men. The World is now crying out for help and the solution apparently comes in the form of, you guessed it, more censorship.
Anti-vaccination rates have been on the rise for some time, critics will tell you that the internet has given vaccine misinformation a huge platform and thus a huge potential audience as well. However, though the internet has been a major player in the ability to spread information which is not in line with accepted state narratives quickly and efficiently, it’s not the only reason.
Twenty years ago few of us had seen a child adversely affected by a Vaccination, however, as the schedule has quickly filled up with more and more vaccines, more of us have experienced first hand the reactions to these allegedly safe vaccines, we have seen our own children or the child of someone close to us suffer a massive seizure, or entire personality changes literally within weeks, days and sometimes hours of the inoculation.
It’s true that the Internet has allowed these stories to spread far and wide and increase the speed at which we’ve reached this point, however, questions and doubt over vaccines were on their way regardless.
But regardless, the truth behind the safety and effectiveness of Vaccines is not the biggest issue here, censorship is.
### WHAT NEXT?
So we’ve seen those questioning official state political and geopolitical narratives censored, we’ve seen voices questioning current social agendas and narratives quashed, we’ve now seen those who question vaccines shutdown, we also reported on Amazons take-down of natural healing against Autism books yesterday – What next?
The next obvious move will be to start shutting down all alternative health channels and voices, specifically those who discourage traditional mainstream treatments, like chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
Will they come for our alternative history books, maybe we’ll see books on alternative teaching practices censored – do you see the problem – Where indeed does it end?
Whatever you think you know about what is best for human civilisation the very worst thing you can do is support shutting down the voices of others who don’t think what you think you know. Because one day you may discover that what you think you thought you knew was a fact was not.
______________________________
> First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
> Because I was not a socialist.Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
> Because I was not a trade unionist.Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
> Because I was not a Jew.Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
> – Martin Niemöller
You can read this article in its original form on our [website](https://www.oye.news/news/internet/does-nobody-see-whats-happening-here/)
So while the debate to whether Vaccines are safe and effective is an important issue in its own right, the underlying factor here which is more important than the debate itself is censorship.
We seem to have short memories as it was only 6 months ago we had a social media culling of first Alex Jones and his Infowars channels, in a coordinated attack all the well known social media giants removed Jones’ content from their platforms.
Shortly after tens of thousands of content providers were reporting their content and channels had been shut down also, since then a string of voices have been silenced on these platforms and it still continues now, why?
In the case of Alex Jones and the voices that followed it we primarily voices which were speaking against the politically accepted narrative and Conspiracy related content.
As is the case with the current anti-vaccination information take down, the censorship of voices such as Jones was down to pressure from people outside of the platform itself.
So here we are now with a graveyard of dead links on google where content creators have been shut down and hundreds of thousands of content creators adjusting their content to avoid their own demise, though through heavy filtering on their content, specifically on Youtube, their demise could be far more slower and painful death then the likes of Infowars.
But, just as the fun was over and the World was moving on from Infowars we have this witch hunt for anyone who doesn’t follow the state suggested Vaccine Schedule. It was all kicked off by multiple measles outbreaks around the World and an intensive fear campaign being pushed by the pharmaceutical whores such as Paul Offit and his band of merry men. The World is now crying out for help and the solution apparently comes in the form of, you guessed it, more censorship.
Anti-vaccination rates have been on the rise for some time, critics will tell you that the internet has given vaccine misinformation a huge platform and thus a huge potential audience as well. However, though the internet has been a major player in the ability to spread information which is not in line with accepted state narratives quickly and efficiently, it’s not the only reason.
Twenty years ago few of us had seen a child adversely affected by a Vaccination, however, as the schedule has quickly filled up with more and more vaccines, more of us have experienced first hand the reactions to these allegedly safe vaccines, we have seen our own children or the child of someone close to us suffer a massive seizure, or entire personality changes literally within weeks, days and sometimes hours of the inoculation.
It’s true that the Internet has allowed these stories to spread far and wide and increase the speed at which we’ve reached this point, however, questions and doubt over vaccines were on their way regardless.
But regardless, the truth behind the safety and effectiveness of Vaccines is not the biggest issue here, censorship is.
### WHAT NEXT?
So we’ve seen those questioning official state political and geopolitical narratives censored, we’ve seen voices questioning current social agendas and narratives quashed, we’ve now seen those who question vaccines shutdown, we also reported on Amazons take-down of natural healing against Autism books yesterday – What next?
The next obvious move will be to start shutting down all alternative health channels and voices, specifically those who discourage traditional mainstream treatments, like chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
Will they come for our alternative history books, maybe we’ll see books on alternative teaching practices censored – do you see the problem – Where indeed does it end?
Whatever you think you know about what is best for human civilisation the very worst thing you can do is support shutting down the voices of others who don’t think what you think you know. Because one day you may discover that what you think you thought you knew was a fact was not.
______________________________
> First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
> Because I was not a socialist.Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
> Because I was not a trade unionist.Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
> Because I was not a Jew.Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
> – Martin Niemöller
You can read this article in its original form on our [website](https://www.oye.news/news/internet/does-nobody-see-whats-happening-here/)
Author
Content Type
Unspecified
image/jpeg
Language
English
More from the publisher
500,000,000.00 LBC
IMAGE
CHRIS
global-censorship
Last [Friday’s shootings in Christchurch](https://www.oye.news/news/shootings/breaking-man-opens-fire-on-a-tram-in-the-dutch-city-of-utrecht/), New Zealand which ended with 50 dead and just as many injured have rung the global bell on a call for tougher media censorship.
Yesterday an open letter from Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu, who is the head of Counter-Terrorism Policing in the UK was published on the counter-terrorism website.
Basu’s letter is a plea for the UK Government to recognise the threat that the free flow of information can have on a nation and to do something about it.
Basu points out the ironic fact that *“the same media companies who have lambasted social media platforms for not acting fast enough to remove extremist content are simultaneously publishing uncensored Daesh propaganda on their websites, or make the rambling ‘manifestos’ of crazed killers available for download.”*
He said extremist propaganda that might reach tens of thousands of people through their own channels or networks has the potential to reach tens of millions if a national newspaper published it.
He goes onto say in summary that:
> ‘Society needs to look carefully at itself. We cannot simply hide behind the mantra of freedom of speech. That freedom is not an absolute right, it is not the freedom to cause harm – that is why our hate speech legislation exists.’ [source](https://www.counterterrorism.police.uk/acso-neil-basu-issues-open-letter-about-reporting-of-terrorism/)
Basu continually refers to this dangerous information that the UK’s media is publishing as Terrorist propaganda, which he claims inspires other potential terrorists into action, he bases this assessment from the statements of terrorists his team have interviewed over the years.
I think it is undeniable that information can be dangerous, it can reinforce beliefs and prejudices, it can raise one’s emotions causing anger and fear. This is true whether the information is accurate or not. Information which has been designed to produce a specific public emotional response, propaganda, is even more dangerous – But, it’s not the root of the problem, it merely accelerates an exceptionally small minority of people to do what they were inevitably going to do anyway.
Censoring our media is a far more dangerous path to take, with dire consequences. A government which controls its media and dictates the flow of information is a Government who has a self-perpetuating power and thus unbreakable control over its people.
While we have been condemning dictatorships across the World for decades with the oppression they place upon their people through censorship and their own propaganda we are voluntarily begging for it ourselves, a little bit at a time.
______________________
Read this article in its original format and thousands more over on our [WEBSITE](https://www.oye.news/news/freedoms/censorship/christchurch-shootings-inspire-global-censorship/)
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
image/jpeg
English
VIDEO
GODFA
plotkin-aborted-babies
In January of 2018 Stanley Plotkin, who is often labelled the Godfather of Vaccines due to his unprecedented amount of work and published literature in the field of Vaccine production was put in front of a camera for a 10 hour deposition in regards to a case involving two parents who had a disagreement over whether their child should, or should not be vaccinated.
Many interesting points came up in the deposition, which we won’t get into right now, but this particular clip is interesting as for many years the idea that aborted fetuses were used in the production of Vaccines was widely regarded as ‘anti-vax’ propaganda. However, as anyone who ever took the time to look at the ingredients of the Vaccines will know, this is simply not the case.
The disturbing part is not necessarily the fact that aborted fetal tissue is used for the production and research into vaccines, but more, where these aborted babies came from. The details are vague, but what we do know is that many of the 76 aborted fetuses are from mothers who aborted for ‘Psychiatric Reasons’. This is not elaborated on but what is noteworthy is that the term ‘voluntary’ is not used in the case of aborted babies used for psychiatric reasons, unlike in the cases resulting from social reasons.
> *The MRC-5 cell line was developed in September 1966 from lung tissue taken from a 14 week fetus aborted for psychiatric reason from a 27 year old physically healthy woman. [source](https://www.coriell.org/0/Sections/Search/Sample_Detail.aspx?Ref=AG05965-C&PgId=166)*
The Morality behind Vaccines is questionable at best and not just because of the use of aborted fetuses in their development. The trials performed by the manufacturers have in the past found to be done, without consent on the Children in developing nations, in some cases killing the test group.
> *The recruitment of hundreds of tribal girls without parental consent for an immunisation study sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on the nod of the warden of their government hostel. Several girls subsequently died. The study was halted by the federal authorities. [source](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/without-consent-how-drugs-companies-exploit-indian-guinea-pigs-6261919.html)*
> *GlaxoSmithKline, Britain’s biggest drug firm, has been fined by an Argentine court over clinical trials of a pneumonia vaccine which was tested on thousands of babies from poor families. [source](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/9006614/GlaxoSmithKline-fined-over-trials-on-the-babies-of-Argentinian-poor.html)*
A confidential GlaxoSmithKline document leaked to the press exposed that within a two-year period, a total of 36 infants died after receiving the 6-in-1 vaccine, Infanrix Hexa. The leaked document can be found [HERE](http://ddata.over-blog.com/3/27/09/71/2012-2013/confid.pdf).
The Pharmaceutical Industry is riddled with fraud, whether it be at a production level or an economic level they follow their own set of rules to benefit themselves first.
For a full list of the known largest pharmaceutical settlements check [HERE](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_pharmaceutical_settlements)
___________________
This article first appeared over on our website [[HERE]](https://www.oye.news/news/health/vaccines/godfather-of-vaccines-on-the-use-of-aborted-babies-for-vaccine-development/)
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
video/mp4
English
Controlling
IMAGE
PICTU
prince-andrew-not-partying
Just hours after the already infamous interview with Prince Andrew was aired on the BBC, where the Prince stated he doesn’t really party among dozens of other ridiculous statements, pictures emerge which seem to contradict his non-partying claims.
If you haven’t watched the interview yet, you really should – If you had any doubts about the validity of the claims against Prince Andrew and his relationship to Jeffery Epstein and Epsteins sex slaves this might just clear up those doubts.
[](https://www.oye.news/news/monarchy/bbc-and-prince-andrew-perform-damage-control-interview/)
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
image/jpeg
English
IMAGE
YOUTU
youtube
Chad Hurley, Steve Chen and Jawed Karim, Youtubes founders developed Youtube for reasons which we still are unclear of today, the story of its founding according to Chen and Hurley is simply based around a personal need which they couldn't fulfil online, sharing videos. Meanwhile, Jawed Karim denies this and claims the idea originally began as a video-based online dating site, this turned into a general video sharing platform when Karim was unable trying to find video footage online of Janet Jackson accidentally 'popped out' of her dress during the 2004 Super Bowl performance
Why these ex-PayPal employees disagree on this is not known and while we cannot be sure exactly why Youtube came into existence, or even by whom, one thing we can be sure of, it did.
In the 15 years since Youtube sprang into life we have seen it change how we watch video forever. But, something even more important which Youtube really kickstarted was independent media. Traditionally, before the days of Youtube, to get an audience for your video productions you would need to spend a lot of money in the hope a Television Network would air your content, in other words, for your average person, without connections in the crony television scene you had no audience. Then came Youtube, offering anybody with a video camera to upload their videos for free and reach millions of people from around the World.
Not only did Youtube provide a platform for people to share their funny videos, music performances and general lunacy, it revolutionised how we get our News. Never before had we had a means to share video evidence of events happening on the other side of the planet so easily and freely. No more did we have to rely on the state and corporate media to provide us with News from around the World, now anybody could report, with video footage on anything, from anywhere - to anywhere in the World.
But as they say, nothing lasts forever and as with most things that can be used for extreme good, when in the wrong hands they can be used for extreme evil. The intention of where Youtube was destined for may or may not have been there from the beginning, this we do not know. But regardless, whether by initial design or infiltration further down the line once the site was snapped up by Google (a more likely scenario), the good days are over and the dark days are here. Youtube has become a tool designed for those with nefarious intentions.
#### The Purge
Over the past year, YouTube has begun to deplatform, demonetise and develop new algorithms to ensure the content you see is the content it wants you to see, not the content you want to see. It all began with the deplatforming of Alex Jones popular channel, Infowars in the summer of 2018. This was just the beginning though, as thousands of channels found themselves shut down literally overnight, without warning.
_________________
[](https://open.lbry.com/@MH#5bd299a92e7b31865d2bb3e2313402edaca41a94/Why-I-Quit-YouTube)
________________
But the censorship goes far deeper than this, though having your channel deplatformed is the ultimate censorship, YouTube has many more tricks up their sleeves which work in silence, without the heavy handed approach of shutting down channels entirely. More and more content creators are finding their video's demonetised. Entire back catalogues of some channels have found their content demonetized overnight. But thats not all, YouTube is also continually adjusting their Search algorithims to push content they don't want you to see off the radar and content they do want you to see in the spotlight.
YouTube are not holding back, they have openly admitted that no only is content being removed which violates their policies - but they will also remove content which they deem 'Borderline':
> *“We, you know, we rank content based on quality. And so we are bringing that same notion and approach to YouTube so that we can rank higher quality stuff better and really prevent borderline content. Content which doesn’t exactly violate policies, which need to be removed, but which can still cause harm,” [source](https://hannity.com/media-room/the-purge-youtube-seeks-to-limit-borderline-content-videos-that-dont-exactly-violate-policies/)*
[](https://youtu.be/igYXPKctRyw)
___________
The question is, what does YouTube define as quality content. Google CEO Sundar Pichai keeps referring to quality content, but quality content according to whom. One thing is clear, when they refer to quality content they are not talking about quality content in the eyes of their users.
#### Television 2.0
What we are seeing is a regression of YouTube back to the Television era. Where content is tightly controlled and thus narratives controlled. The rise of the Internet took freedom of speech to a new level never seen before. Everyone had a stage to speak on if they so chose to, all voices were placed on a level playing field and given the ability to speak to millions of people. Controversial topics were no longer limited to living room discussions at home, the Internet allowed all of us to have a voice.
Effectively what is happening to YouTube right now is taking what was once, a free and fair way of distributing content across the World, to a platform that carefully selects content which aligns with their own interests and then targets those they want to see it. Not dissimilar to how we used to view content from broadcast television, except now it is far more powerful as content can be handpicked at an individual level.
This is social engineering like we have never seen before, and best of all YouTube's efforts in controlling the narrative are backed up and reinforced by all the other major platforms allowing content sharing. Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are all doing exactly the same thing. OYE Alternative News: Real News you can trust. Independent News and carefully selected Mainstream News. Wake Up
#### We Have the Power to End This, Right Now
All the measures taken by the likes of YouTube are only effective if the people continue to use their platforms, however, by switching to alternative content sharing platforms which don't censor, demonetize and filter out content based on the narrative contained within the content.
There are plenty of alternatives out there and more and more are being built every week. We won't get into the array of alternative platforms you can jump over to in this article, but as an example in this original article which was published on our website at [OYE.NEWS](https://www.oye.news/news/freedoms/censorship/youtube-is-killing-free-speech/) we used a video shared on the [LBRY network](https://api.lbry.com/user/refer?r=88x1VXeGJx9Be3eygg6rtHAJu8CDx5Sn). LBRY is a decentralized content sharing platform which is currently seeing massive growth as more and more people seek refuge in this purge of free speech.
##### [Click here to view our channel on LBRY](https://open.lbry.com/@OYENEWS#e11e2fc3056137948d2cc83fb5ca2ce9b57025ec)
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
image/jpeg
English
Controlling
IMAGE
FOOD
food-supplies-in-danger
**The government’s reactions around the World to the pandemic has had many detrimental side effects on society.**
**One which we will have all heard about, but really isn’t being discussed enough, is the devastation caused to the food industry.**
As the pandemic got underway, and the lockdowns began, every step of the food supply chains were effected. But ultimately every step effected had a knock on effect in both directions of the supply chain.
The end result is a producer with an excess of produce and a consumer with not enough. But it gets worse, farming is a very time sensitive business in the 21st century. When the supply chain breaks down, farmers are left with a backlog of produce which quickly becomes worthless.
#### You can view this article in its entirety with sources and additional video content [HERE](https://oye.news/news/world-news/food-supplies-are-in-real-danger-and-no-ones-talking-about-it/)
#### If you like what we do and want to support independent media you can support us in the following ways:
1. Crypto Donations via [Cointr.ee/oyenews](https://Cointr.ee/oyenews)
2. [Paypal](https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=Q5NJR56PQ4RKA&source=url)
3. [Cash App](https://cash.app/%C2%A3oyenews)
[](https://oye.news/news/health/the-medical-industrial-complex-virus-hunters/)
### For the latest News delivered direct to your LBRY FEED simply FOLLOW US!
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
image/jpeg
English
Controlling
EU TO
eu-speed-approval-variant-vaccines
No description available
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
text/markdown
English
Controlling
ITALY
italy-section-covid19
Italy jumps on the Draconian bandwagon as new coronavirus cases place the nation into panic.
#### Please leave your comments below, we would love to hear from you.
#### You can view this article in its original form with additional video content go [HERE](https://oye.news/news/health/italy-could-section-people-who-refuse-treatment-for-covid-19/)
#### If you like what we do and want to support independent media you can support us in the following ways:
1. Crypto Donations via [Cointr.ee/oyenews](https://Cointr.ee/oyenews)
2. [Paypal](https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=Q5NJR56PQ4RKA&source=url)
3. [Cash App](https://cash.app/%C2%A3oyenews)
[](https://oye.news/news/health/95-of-uk-covid-19-deaths-had-pre-existing-health-condition/)
### For the latest News delivered direct to your LBRY FEED simply FOLLOW US!
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
text/markdown
English
Controlling
IMAGE
FULLY
vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has repeatedly asked CDC to create studies which explain, “How do child health outcomes compare between fully vaccinated and unvaccinated children?”
During a November 2012 Congressional hearing on autism before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Dr. Coleen Boyle, the Director of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, gave evasive answers to lawmakers pressing her on this point. After considerable badgering, she finally stated, “We have not studied vaccinated versus unvaccinated [children].” That was perjury.Verstraeten found a dramatic link between mercury-containing hepatitis B vaccines and several neurological injuries including autism and prepared the study for publication.
Boyle knew that CDC had commissioned an in-house researcher, Thomas Verstraeten to perform vaccinated/unvaccinated study on CDC’s giant Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) in 1999 (I summarize Verstraeten’s secret findings on slide 2). Verstraeten found a dramatic link between mercury-containing hepatitis B vaccines and several neurological injuries including autism and prepared the study for publication. CDC shared Verstraeten’s analysis with the then four vaccine makers but kept it secret from the American public.
The world’s largest vaccine maker GSK whisked Verstraeten off to a sinecure in Brussels and CDC handed his raw data to his CDC boss Frank DeStefano and another researcher, Robert Davis who served as a vaccine industry consultant. Those two men tortured the data for 4 years, removing all unvaccinated children, to bury the autism signal before publishing a sanitized version purporting to exculpate the vaccine. The CDC then cut off public access to the VSD and to this day aggressively blocks any attempts by researchers to study health outcomes in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated populations.
Despite CDC’s efforts at suppression, independent scientists and research institutions (including UCLA) have managed to conduct and publish several additional vaccinated/unvaccinated studies since 1999. Those studies indicate high incidence of chronic diseases and brain and immune system injuries among vaccinated compared to unvaccinated cohorts. I summarize some of these reports in the following slides. [(See full-sized slides)](https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/06-25-19-Vaxxed-vs-Unvaxxed-Slides.pdf)
______________________________
Read this article in full over on our website [HERE](https://www.oye.news/news/health/fully-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-by-robert-f-kennedy-jr/)
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
image/jpeg
English
Controlling
‘GR
greta-thunberg-merch
Its been a few weeks since we last touched on everyone’s favourite activist superhero, so here we are again – this time its in relation to Greta Thunberg merchandise, yes you heard it right people actually buy this stuff!
The Times has reported that despite a boom in the sale of Swedish eco-activist Greta Thunberg-related merchandise indicating greater environmental awareness, much of it is either transported from China or made from environmentally unfriendly materials.
The “Greta” memorabilia (we kid you not) includes a variety of T-shirts, mugs, stickers, badges and bags which are currently available online via Amazon, eBay, Etsy and other online marketplaces.
[The Times](https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/greta-thunberg-merchandise-sellers-strike-it-rich-xtskjjbpw) reports:
> *“The gnome, for example, is made from bonded acrylic resin, a material that is not easily recycled nor readily biodegradable. The manufacture of acrylic can also involve toxins that are potentially harmful to factory workers and the environment, according to campaigners,” the survey asserts.*
> *Of the dozens of Greta products […] only one offered any money to green charities, with a lone T-shirt vendor on eBay promising to donate 10 per cent of proceeds to Save the Planet”, the analysis claimed.*
Of course, it’s probably fair to say that Greta has no affiliation with the manufacturers and retailers of these products, but the fact that they exist would indicate there is a demand and thus exposes the hypocrisy of many of her supporters.
Greta Thunberg has received a lot of hatred and abuse online, however, this is a misguided attack as she is not at fault, she is simply a child being used to fulfil an agenda. It is her parents, the charities, Government entities and her millions upon millions of misinformed supporters that are to blame.
Greta Thunberg declined to comment.
Transaction
Created
1 year ago
Content Type
Language
text/markdown
English