Welcome to the Youtube exclusive: Classroom On The Air! Who's Life Have We Mastered Stay tuned for more knowledge!!! Follow PRN.Live: Twiiter: twitter.com/live_prn Tumblr: tumblr.com/prnlive Odysee: odysee.com/@garynull ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVDXdgMP8N8

Source: https://www.podbean.com/eau/pb-uadzt-faea01 Against the Misuse of Science in the So-called “Pandemic”. The RT-PCR Test Prof. Dr. Reiner Anderl, Declaring His Resignation from the Academy of Sciences By Prof. Dr. Thomas Aigner Global Research, February 14, 2021 Letter to the President of the Academy of Sciences and Literature in Mainz,  Dear colleagues,  With greatest astonishment, with deepest concern, even bewilderment, I have taken note of the “7th ad hoc statement” of the National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina of 8.12.2020. In my opinion, this paper is not worthy of an honest, critical-balancing science oriented towards the service and welfare of human beings. I do not have medical expertise. However, as a scientist committed to nothing but the pure truth, I take the liberty of speaking out. I feel very strongly alarmed by several points: on 11/27/2020, a group of 22 internationally renowned experts submitted the following expert opinion on the PCR test, the linchpin of the “pandemic”, for the journal Eurosurveillance: “External peer review of the RT-PCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results”. Quote: “This highly questions the scientific validity of the test”. Furthermore, the serious remark: “serious conflicts of interest of the authors are not mentioned” (1). The PCR test is the basis of the justification for declaring a “pandemic”, and RKI, politicians and the media announce the positive test results daily as so-called “new infections”. According to the 22 independent experts, the test contains “several scientific inadequacies, errors and flaws”. It is clearly stated: “the test (is) unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus and make inferences about the presence of an infection”.  Is it not obvious that there is an extremely serious problem here, which should actually shake the whole “pandemic”? I cannot understand why neither the Leopoldina nor other academies include this well-founded expert opinion and demand or initiate a further, thorough and scientifically clean clarification. Based on this “pandemic”, which is based on at least a very questionable test, a worldwide vaccination campaign is now to be started on an unprecedented scale;and this with vaccines that have never been tested before and that have been developed at an unprecedented speed. In light of the first reported serious side effects and after warnings from renowned experts, it is clear that the completely novel RNA vaccines have been far from adequately tested, especially with regard to long-term effects. Why are the academies silent on such existential issues? Problematic aspects ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMqs9cJh8Nc