LBRY Block Explorer

LBRY Claims • seafood-doom-the-corporate-syndrome

817fc5e67aa493aca3870f50e441c0306f5d3f3d

Published By
Created On
12 Feb 2021 23:48:28 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
Seafood Doom: The Corporate Syndrome
"Business must learn the lesson, long ago learned by labor and other self-interest groups. This is the lesson that political power is necessary; that such power must be assiduously cultivated; and that when necessary, it must be used aggressively and with determination - without embarrassment and without the reluctance. As unwelcome as it may be, ...it should consider assuming a broader and more vigorous role in the political arena." -1971 Lewis F. Powell, corporate lawyer

http://www.reclaimdemocracy.org/corporate_accountability/powell_memo_lewis.html

April 5, 2010
RADIATION EXPOSURE DEBATE RAGES INSIDE EPA — Plan to Radically Hike Post-Accident Radiation in Food & Water Sparks Hot Dissent
Contact: Kirsten Stade (202) 265-7337

Washington, DC — A plan awaiting approval by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that would dramatically increase permissible radioactive releases in drinking water, food and soil after "radiological incidents" is drawing vigorous objections from agency experts, according to agency documents released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). At issue is the acceptable level of public health risk following a radiation release, whether an accidental spill or a "dirty bomb" attack.

The radiation arm of EPA, called the Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (ORIA), has prepared an update of the 1992 "Protective Action Guides" (PAG) governing radiation protection decisions for both short-term and long-term cleanup standards. Other divisions within EPA contend the ORIA plan geometrically raises allowable exposure to the public. For example, as Charles Openchowski of EPA's Office of General Counsel wrote in a January 23, 2009 e-mail to ORIA:

"[T]his guidance would allow cleanup levels that exceed MCLs [Maximum Contamination Limits under the Safe Drinking Water Act] by a factor of 100, 1000, and in two instances 7 million and there is nothing to prevent those levels from being the final cleanup achieved (i.e., it's not confined to immediate response of emergency phase)."

Another EPA official, Stuart Walker of the Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, explains what the proposed new radiation limits in drinking water would mean:

"It also appears that drinking water at the PAG concentrations...may lead to subchronic (acute) effects following exposures of a day or a week. In a population, one should see some express acute effects...that is vomiting, fever, etc."

"This critical debate is taking place entirely behind closed doors because this plan is 'guidance' and does not require public notice as a regulation would," stated PEER Counsel Christine Erickson. Today, PEER sent EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson a letter calling for a more open and broader examination of t
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vbxgoSRQDY
Author
Content Type
Unspecified
video/mp4
Language
English
Open in LBRY

More from the publisher

Controlling
VIDEO
OKC B
Controlling
VIDEO
BUTTI
VIDEO
A LIN
Controlling
VIDEO
SULLY
Controlling
VIDEO
FAUCI
Controlling
VIDEO
MURDE
Controlling
VIDEO
GLADI
Controlling
VIDEO
THE F
Controlling
VIDEO
THE P