"A short promotional video to introduce myself and the channel Stellium7 on both Youtube and Bitchute. Please feel free to share and mirror!
If you like what I have done, and would like to support the work, you can do so via Paypal, Patreon or Bitcoin. If you would specifically like to contribute to an eventual DNA analysis of samples from the mountain, please be sure to make note, and I will earmark the funds for testing."
One of the most common alleged proofs quoted for the spherical Earth theory is the Eratosthenes sticks and shadows experiment. Many people may remember NASA spokesman Carl Sagan presenting this experiment by using a map of Egypt with two obelisks attached and showing their resulting shadows. The story goes that around 250 B.C. a Greek mathematician and philosopher named Eratosthenes noted that at noon during the Summer Solstice in Syene, the Sun cast no shadow and the rays could reach straight to the bottom of his well, yet meanwhile in Alexandria a vertically standing metal rod cast a significant shadow. Eratosthenes, Carl Sagan, and other globe proponents reason that this result is impossible on a flat Earth. To quote Carl Sagan, "If at a certain moment each stick casts no shadow at all, that is perfectly easy to understand provided the Earth is flat. If the shadow at Syene is a certain length, and the shadow at Alexandria is the same length, that also makes sense on a flat Earth. But how could it be, Eratosthenes asked, that at the same instant there was no shadow at Syene and a very substantial shadow at Alexandria? The only answer (he claimed) was that the surface of the Earth is curved." After reaching this conclusion, Eratosthenes then famously factored the length of the two shadows with his assumed distance to the Sun and recorded a measurement of the globe Earth's circumference close to what heliocentrist astronomers still use today.
The fact of the matter is, however, that Eratosthenes, Sagan, and others are simply incorrect in their assumption that this would only be possible on a curved Earth. In reality, the exact same results occur on a flat Earth with a local Sun. Eratosthenes’ calculations were made assuming the Sun to be millions of miles away so that its rays would fall perfectly parallel even in points as divergent as Syene and Alexandria. Anyone familiar with the phenomenon known as crepuscular rays, however, knows full well that the Sun's rays simply do NOT fall perfectly parallel, especially at such distant points, rendering the entire argument moot. Furthermore, using sextants and plane trigonometry, by measuring the Sun’s angle at two points on Earth simultaneously and factoring their distance from each other, the Pythagorean theorum reveals that the Sun is NOT millions of miles away, but instead less than a few thousand. High altitude balloon footage has also filmed lighting hot-spots on clouds further proving the Sun to be local and acting as a spotlight. Therefore if globe believers wish to be honest, they must admit it is their faulty assumption that only a distant Sun with parallel rays could produce such results which has led to their faulty conclusion of a curved Earth, because Flat Earthers have al
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVws1sZ6blo
Globe-earthers say Flat Earthers are brainwashed. Flat Earthers say globe-earthers are brainwashed. Who's right? Let's look at it this way: Globe-earthers ar...
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7_k5G5uUe8
The Aether Field Exists : Just as it had been predicted.
Michelson and Morley's Interferometer experiment failed due to lack of equipment. The US Air Force repeated their experiment in 1986 and discovered that the field actually exists. Not only that, the field measured the same way Michelson and Morley predicted!! Our "science" has been wrong all along.
Check it out for yourself: E.W Silvertooth, " Special Relativity", Nature Magazine - Vol 322 (August 1986): p.590
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyfrBha47YA
Globe-earthers say Flat Earthers are brainwashed.
Flat Earthers say globe-earthers are brainwashed.
Who's right?
Let's look at it this way: Globe-earthers are simply advocating the first version of reality they were taught as children. Meanwhile, all Flat Earthers were taught that SAME version of reality as children, the only difference being that they went back as adults and did their due diligence in researching the opposing arguments WITHOUT any bias or cognitive dissonance to see whether or not what they were taught as children still stood up to the critical scrutiny of a discerning adult.
Then, after doing so and finding fatal flaws in the model, these discerning adults went against all of society. They endured endless insults and ridicule - many losing friends and family members in the process - all for DARING to question the globe "gospel".
What do you think made these people turn a 180? Could they have actually discovered information that changed their minds?
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucdwqzLQVdo
https://goodgodministry.com/
"The Goodness of God teachings are intended to reveal the true nature of our Father and clear away evil misunderstandings. Profound mysteries will be resolved in this teaching series and you will be set free from the Evil Old Testament God, as well as misunderstandings in the New Testament, such as eternal punishment by fire. As we see the goodness of God more clearly, our love for Him will increase, and our faith will become more effective because doubts about His character will be cleared away. Amen!" ~ B.C.
Bobby Collier's YouTube Channel, "Good God": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVW-gzdmB2ggMVMZuA6qGsQ
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBpFXLW72KA
This is a top-down view of the oceans and continents, meaning you are looking straight down on our world - the North Pole region is in the center, and Antarctica surrounds the whole thing (we just don't know how far OUT it extends, thanks to the Antarctic Treaty).
The size of the sun and moon represented here are WAY too big, just so you know. Rob made them this large so you could discern which was which. I think it's cool you can watch the moon shift through its' phases as the days pass by. We also get a good idea of the sun's movement from the Tropic of Cancer (23.5 degrees north of the equator) to the Tropic of Capricorn (23.5 degrees south of the equator) during its' 6-month journey between the two.
If the sun's true size was shown here, it would be a mere pin-prick of light at this scale. The distance from one coastline of Antarctica, across the north pole area to the other coastline is approximately 25,000 miles, and the sun is probably less than 50 miles wide, so you get the idea. The sun is VERY small and its' light obeys the INVERSE SQUARE LAW, meaning the light DIMS fairly rapidly over a relatively short distance. The sun's light cannot illuminate the entire world below it all at once. By my estimations, based on this model and the position of the sun during "sunrise" and "sunset" (forgive the globe model references), the sun's light only reaches about 9000-10,000 miles in any direction.
This is a good video to show others when explaining how the seasons work in our enclosed, level and stationary world. Keep coming back to it until you are totally familiar with how these celestial lights move.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_W1QQs54fxE
"My interpretation, is that The Biblical Firmament, also called Heaven, is reflective molten liquid + sound, producing light (stars) within it. The phenomenon of sound producing light, in liquid, is called “cymatic sonoluminescence”.
FIRMAMENT (HEAVEN):
“Thus God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament; and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. - Genesis 1:7-13 NKJV
REFLECTIVE MOLTEN LIQUID:
“Canst thou with him spread out the sky, Which is strong as a molten mirror?” - Job 37:18 ASV
***mol·ten: (especially of materials with a high melting point, such as metal and glass) liquefied by heat.***
SOUND (CYMATICS):
“Hear, oh, hear the noise of his voice, And the sound that goeth out of his mouth. He sendeth it forth under the whole heaven, And his lightening unto the ends of the earth.” - Job 37:2,3 ASV
***Notice that Job 37:2,3 says “LIGHTENING” (stars lightening Earth), not lightning***
STARS MOVING ABOVE FLAT EARTH’S FACE:
“And it is turned round about by his guidance, That they may do whatsoever he commandeth them Upon the face of the habitable world” - Job 37:12 ASV
***If Earth were a globe, “face of the habitable world”, wouldn’t make sense. The globe Earth theory would have to be at least two faced (Antarctica facing opposite direction of Arctic)… Faces only face one direction. Flat Earth faces the sky.***"
~ Adam Campbell (July 14, 2021)
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCMu02PPCXc
"One simple and definitive proof that you are not living on a spinning ball orbiting around the Sun is the fact that daytime and nighttime never switch places as they must for the heliocentric model to be true. According to the globe doctrine, Earth makes one complete rotation on its axis every 24 hours, while simultaneously orbiting around the Sun and completing one full revolution every 365 days. If this was truly happening however, as you can see from the following image, the daytime and nighttime sides of the globe would have to flip every 6 months.
For a more detailed illustration of this, imagine the Sun rising at 6am in New York on the Summer solstice. After 3 months of 24 hour rotations, the globe would be 90 degrees from its previous position and a quarter turn away from the Sun, meaning that sunrise in New York during the Autumnal equinox should now be happening at midnight. After 3 more months of 24 hour rotations, the globe would be on the complete opposite side of the Sun, 180 degrees from its starting position, so that sunrise in New York during the Winter solstice should be happening at 6pm, or in other words, daytime and nighttime would have completely flipped from 6 months earlier. After 3 more months of 24 hour rotations, the globe would be 270 degrees from its original position, and sunrise in New York during the Spring equinox should be happening at noon.
In reality, as you can test and observe for yourself, this simply does not happen and remains yet another nail in the globe's coffin. Globe apologist naysayers make either one of two ridiculous claims in an attempt to excuse away this clear problem in their model. Their first defense is to claim that days are not actually 24 hours long, but instead only 23:56 long, and this 4 minute difference per day fixes the math allowing day and night to flip. Now it is true that there are two kinds of days known as solar days and sidereal days, and sidereal days are in fact 23:56 minutes long, but solar days, which everyone on Earth sets their clocks by, are exactly 24 hours in duration. Sidereal days, which nobody sets their clocks by, are actually how long the fixed stars take to make one revolution over and around our Earth plane. As you can observe and measure for yourself, the constellations rotate just slightly faster than the Sun, so that they take exactly 23:56 minutes to come back to their starting point, while the Sun takes exactly 24 hours to come back to its starting point.
Firstly, the fact that sidereal and solar days both exist and are not exactly the same duration, is yet another proof that the stars and Sun are moving and not the Earth. If the apparent movement of the stars and Sun was actually the result of us living on a spinning globe, as we're told, then
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWqQclJNNYo
"People talk GLIBLY about science. What is science? People coming out of a university with a masters degree or a PhD - you take them into the field and they literally don't believe anything unless there's a peer-reviewed paper! That's the only thing they accept. And you say to them, "but... Let's observe, Let's think, Let's discuss." They don't do it. It's just, "Is it in a peer-reviewed paper, or not?" That's their view of science! I think it's pathetic!
Going into universities as bright young people - they come out of them BRAIN DEAD, not even knowing what science means. They think it means peer-reviewed papers, etc. NO! That's "Academia"! And if a paper is peer-reviewed, it means everybody thought the SAME, therefore they approved it. An unintended consequence is that when NEW knowledge emerges, NEW scientific insights... they can never, ever be peer-reviewed.
So, we're blocking all new advances in Science, that are big advances. If you look at the breakthroughs in Science, almost always they don't come from the center of that profession - they come from the fringe. The finest candle makers in the world couldn't even think of electric lights. They don't come from within, they often come from the outside the bricks.
We're going to kill ourselves because of stupidity."
~ Professor Allan Savory.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTOMkj15uco