There is NO problem using double negatives to express a negative more intensely. In fact, there's a term for it: "negative concord." Once again, the only reason the grammar snobs are against it is because Latin doesn't do it, and they think English should be like Latin. _____ YᴏᴜTᴜʙᴇ: https://www.youtube.com/shanedk BɪᴛCʜᴜᴛᴇ: https://www.bitchute.com/shanedk/ Lɪᴠᴇsᴛʀᴇᴀᴍs: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg3bMbE6gbL1GaADuZaC8jw Pᴀᴛʀᴇᴏɴ: https://www.patreon.com/shanedk MᴀᴋᴇʀSᴜᴘᴘᴏʀᴛ https://www.makersupport.com/shanedk Pᴏᴅᴄᴀsᴛ: http://podcast.bogosity.tv/ Dɪsᴄᴏʀᴅ: https://discord.bogosity.tv/ Mᴀsᴛᴏᴅᴏɴ: @shanedk@mastadon.social @shanedk@mstdn.io PᴀʏPᴀʟ: https://www.paypal.me/shanedk Bɪᴛᴄᴏɪɴ Cᴀsʜ: 1PyiWjnNK4TivWwzchprVYBwBxCbJrSK7M DASH: XmebStk9yUTzDCnwnxGkTCRzvm3HjRUXwi AʟᴛCᴏɪɴs: http://altcoins.bogosity.tv ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsGKR-n66F4

The very first story on the very first podcast was about the Fukushima nuclear disaster. We've been following it ever since. From the Bogosity Podcast for 21 March 2011 Snopes article on the bogus fallout graphic: http://www.snopes.com/photos/technology/fallout.asp New York Times report on the USS Ronald Reagan: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/14/world/asia/14plume.html?_r=2 Phil Plait's coverage of the event: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/03/14/the-japanese-nuclear-reactor-overreaction/ Scientific American article about the radiation from coal plants: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste _____ ?Pᴏᴅᴄᴀꜱᴛ: https://podcast.bogosity.tv/ ?Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: https://discord.bogosity.tv/ ▶️YᴏᴜTᴜʙᴇ: https://www.youtube.com/shanedk ▶️Oᴅʏsᴇᴇ: https://odysee.com/%24/invite/@shanedk:4 ?Dᴏɴᴀᴛᴇ ᴏʀ ꜱᴜʙꜱᴄʀɪʙᴇ: https://donate.bogosity.tv ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BHBFePohEU