Australian Gunman Brenton Tarrant who killed 50 people in a violent gun attack at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand on Friday has been arrested and is safely behind bars, however, the days that have followed this tragic event have opened the doors for yet more censorship. Tarrant who is a self-proclaimed white supremacist videoed the entire event live on Facebook, this has left social media open for yet more scrutiny on how they manage their platforms content. The video as you’d expect has now been removed from [Facebook and have continued to take down copies of the video](https://twitter.com/fbnewsroom/status/1107117981358682112) that have been uploaded to the platform since and even edited versions of the video which do not show graphic content. The Video itself is filmed in a Video game first-person perspective shoot em’ up style, with the weapon at the forefront of the scene and targets in the background. While it seems reasonable to remove the video from a social network platform such as Facebook, particularly with young children accessing the platform regularly being exposed to this vile content, but the question of why now, why this violent and bloody massacre? Over the past few years Facebook as been the host to hundreds of video’s of brutal attacks against innocent people, we saw the brutal killing of the Palestinian boy in 2016, this footage though marked as explicit content on Facebook and other platforms was still flooding the networks, some were removed but there was no declared censorship of the video from the media. New Zealand authorities have not only pushed this censorship throughout online media platforms it has also made a stark warning to the general public: > *“Anybody found “knowingly” in possession of objectionable material can receive a maximum of 10 years imprisonment.[source](https://twitter.com/nickmon1112/status/1106978863400316929)”* **DISSENTER BLOCKED IN NEW ZEALAND** Investigations and censorship of content sharing platforms such as Bitchute and 8chan are already underway and it was just recently announced that Dissenter has been blocked from New Zealand. For those that have never heard of Dissenter here is how they define their purpose: > *Dissenter is designed to extend American civil liberties protections for political speech to every corner of the planet, and allows people to express themselves on any subject, at any time, on any url, in a manner which is or would be permissible under U.S. law. Ideally we can accomplish this goal and empower hundreds of millions if not billions of people around the world to say what they want to, when they want to, how they want to and keep the internet free and open.* In a nutshell, they attempt to keep free speech alive by allowing anyone, anywhere in the world to share any web content with comment(s) onto the Dissenter servers. **BRITISH MAN ARRESTED** The censorship has been far reaching beyond the borders of New Zealand as a man in the UK is arrested for sharing communications which are alleged to support the attacks on social media: > “Police have made urgent enquiries and a man aged 24 from the Oldham area is now under arrest on suspicion of sending malicious communications.” [source](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/new-zealand-christchurch-mosque-attack-man-arrested-oldham-social-media-post-a8826576.html)** Far-right commentator Milo Yiannopoulos was also banned from Australia in the wake of the New Zealand shootings after he posted on Facebook that attacks like Christchurch happen because “the establishment panders to and mollycoddles extremist leftism and barbaric, alien religious cultures.” **SETTING A PRECEDENT** The problem we have here is not that people can no longer easily access a video showing the violent attack carried out in New Zealand, this without the consequences of what is to follow is a positive action – it is the new precedent set by the actions the extreme actions they have taken. [Censorship has been occurring at record levels](https://www.oye.news/news/internet/does-nobody-see-whats-happening-here/) over the past few months, with [anti-vaccination narratives being shut down](https://www.oye.news/news/health/facebook-to-censor-all-anti-vaccination-conent/), alternative health care books being [removed from Amazon](https://www.oye.news/news/freedoms/media-calls-for-further-book-burning/), conspiracy-based media platforms being shut down across multiple social networks and the list goes on. This latest effort in censorship has added another layer of censorship across the World, this time shutting down any material being shared involved with horrific criminal acts, while the obvious risk in play is that of copy-cat attacks inspired from the original footage, the reality is anyone can still see the footage if they really want to, with open decentralised networks now commonplace nothing is truly censored, at least not to those with a motivation to find it. Typically someone in a mental state capable of performing copy-cat attacks replicating violent crimes as we saw on Friday is hanging out in places where such content is available anyway. But what this censorship does do is place the fear into anyone wanting to check the evidence out for themselves and as we know sometimes the evidence is highly questionable as was the case with the [Manchester Bombings](https://www.oye.news/news/war/terrorism/manchester-bomber-british-intelligence-mi6-asset/) in the UK back in 2017. Just because people are dead and injured does not mean the evidence should not be scrutinized by people outside of Government control. Corruption and deception exist whether we want to accept it or not. In this [article](https://www.oye.news/news/world-news/false-flag-operation-caught-video-iraq/) we see an example of a False Flag event reported as real by the Worlds mainstream media but proven to be fake footage thanks to the Internet. **WAS THIS ATTACK A FALSE FLAG?** Within minutes of the Attack being reported around the World, the usual False Flag claims were made across social media and forums, websites such as the conspiracy blogger aanirfan began putting the case together for a False Flag narrative, but is there any evidence to support these claims. Well, not as much as there was since everything has been removed from the public eye. This has just bolstered the idea of a false flag even more so to many as questions are being asked to why such an aggressive censorship campaign is underway. The truth is, we don’t know and we are not going to pretend to know, however regardless of whether this is simply a white supremacist losing his mind and gunning down 100 people in two mosques, the event itself will undoubtedly ensure further restrictions on the rest of us. For New Zealand, gun control laws are already being placed into question, while media sharing platforms such as bitchute, dissenter and 8chan have also come under the spotlight. Will we see decentralised media platforms banned also and anyone using them identified as a criminal? There is more than we can imagine at stake here but unfortunately many will happily accept whatever is put in place by their Governments as the horrors we see override any form of rational thinking.

The idea of being able to reproduce human life outside of the Womb is nothing new, in fact back in 1924 the term ectogenesis was created by J.B.S. Haldane to define this process. Here we are over 90 years later and ectogenesis is not far off a reality. > *‘For the first time, scientists have managed to grow human embryos to at least 14 days old inside a petri dish. Their work has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of what makes us human—and it’s the next step on the road to completely artificial, womb-free reproduction. In fact, it’s possible that these embryos might even have kept growing past two weeks, if the scientists did not have to terminate them for ethical reasons.’ – [Vice.com](https://motherboard.vice.com/read/artificial-womb-free-births-just-got-a-lot-more-real-cambridge-embryo-reproduction)* Of course such a technology would allow mothers who are unable to have children a great opportunity to start a family, however aside from this obvious advantage such a technology is bundled with a whole host of potentially dire consequences. #### THE END OF ‘THE FAMILY UNIT’ The traditional ‘family unit’ has been under attack for many decades, whether you believe this is by design or by a side affect of societal advancement this fact remains the same. The sexualisation of children over the last two decades but most predominantly the last decade has played the biggest part in this, Nick Ferrari made some good points on this in an article he wrote for The Express: In a practice that sounds like a relic from Stalinist russia or hitler’s Germany, the state now injects girls as young as 13 with drugs enabling them to have supposedly worry-free sex, while their parents do not have to be consulted or informed. School nurses aren’t allowed to apply even a sticking plaster to children in case they have a dangerous allergic reaction, but pumping schoolgirls full of hormones so they can get at it like brood mares is just dandy. Such a technology will allow initially allow the wealthy Hollywood types to have children without the negative cosmetic affects to their body, as technology improves and the cost of such a procedure drops it will become more widely available. All this might sound amazing to a Women, no more sickness, no more waddling, no more stretch marks, no more painful birth….. but at what cost? Maternal Instinct is what is lost from all this, the unbreakable bond between a mother and child is formed inside the womb – to loose this would remove one of life’s greatest miracles. Scientists have now found that the cells from their babies also reside in the Mothers brain which are transmitted during gestation: Microchimerism most commonly results from the exchange of cells across the placenta during pregnancy, however there is also evidence that cells may be transferred from mother to infant through nursing. In addition to exchange between mother and fetus, there may be exchange of cells between twins in utero, and there is also the possibility that cells from an older sibling residing in the mother may find their way back across the placenta to a younger sibling during the latter’s gestation. – Scientific American If you also consider that a Child’s personality is vastly impacted by its time within the Womb, a safe secure environment, the beating of it’s mothers heart, the thrumming flow of her blood, the sound of other family members voices. No artificial womb can re-create this, and the long term affects for the child are unknown. #### AND SOMETHING FAR MORE SINISTER But there are potentially far more sinister aspects to this technology. If you follow the news you would of seen recently Paypal co-founder Peter Thiel talking about how he believes the Blood of the young can make you live longer. Babies blood has long been thought to increase longevity of life and science is now backing up this theory. The use of young children and babies is common in Satanic rituals throughout history, such practices still happen in the 21st century, they maybe publicised as a hoax or be entirely covered up, but they happen and more than you’d probably believe. In the following clip Vicki Polin’s talks about her family who were involved in Satanic rituals, sacrifice and cannibalism dating back to the 16th century up to present day. In a more recent case two children caught on film for several hours talked in detail about how their father was the leader of a Satanic cult and drank the blood of babies, according to the children Teachers, Police, Councillors, Social Services were all part of this ‘Satanic Ring’ – Of course the case was dismissed as a hoax by the same Police department that were allegedly involved in the ring: Ricky Dearman was alleged to have been the leader of a satanic cult in north London which imported and killed babies from across the world by his own children in videos which were shared across the internet. Read this article in its entireity [[HERE]](https://www.oye.news/news/science/artificial-wombs-potentially-sinister-future/)