2001: A Space Odyssey is a 1968 epic science fiction film produced and directed by Stanley Kubrick. The screenplay was written by Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke, and was inspired by Clarke's 1951 short story "The Sentinel" and other short stories by Clarke. A novel released after the film's premiere was in part written concurrently with the screenplay. The film follows a voyage to Jupiter with the sentient computer HAL after the discovery of an alien monolith, and deals with themes of existentialism, human evolution, technology, artificial intelligence, and the possibility of extra-terrestrial life.
The film is noted for its scientifically accurate depiction of space flight, pioneering special effects, and ambiguous imagery. Kubrick avoided conventional cinematic and narrative techniques; dialogue is used sparingly, and there are long sequences accompanied only by music. The soundtrack incorporates numerous works of classical music, by composers including Richard Strauss, Johann Strauss II, Aram Khachaturian, and György Ligeti.
The film received diverse critical responses, ranging from those who saw it as darkly apocalyptic to those who saw it as an optimistic reappraisal of the hopes of humanity. It was nominated for four Academy Awards, with Kubrick winning for his direction of the visual effects. The film is widely regarded as one of the greatest and most influential films ever made.
Directed by Stanley Kubrick
Screenplay by Stanley Kubrick, Arthur C. Clarke
Produced by Stanley Kubrick
Starring Keir Dullea, Gary Lockwood
Cinematography Geoffrey Unsworth
Edited by Ray Lovejoy
Production Stanley Kubrick Productions
company
Distributed by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
Release date 2 April 1968 A.D.
Join this cosy little CNBC fireside chat with World Economic Forum President Borge Brende and Producer, Actor and Investor Robert Downey Jr (founder of FootPrint Coalition) to accelerate investment into 'planet-saving' technology and assemble the right stakeholders to make a difference.
https://www.footprintcoalition.com/
https://www.weforum.org/focus/the-davos-agenda-2021
Former NHS consultant Dr Gary Sidley explains the covert psychological attacks being inflicted on the British people by the government and media.
Please sign Dr Sidley's petition - "End All Requirements to Wear Face Coverings Immediately" https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/581316
Articles by Dr Sidley:
Continued Mask Wearing Won’t Help Us Return to Normal -
https://thecritic.co.uk/continued-mask-wearing-wont-help-us-return-to-normal/
A Year of Fear - https://thecritic.co.uk/a-year-of-fear/
This video is a segment of the 60th session of the Corona Investigative Committee which was live-streamed on July 9, 2021.
Credit -
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4UBVddvJ2amb/
Source -
https://corona-ausschuss.de
Eisenhower's farewell address (sometimes referred to as "Eisenhower's farewell address to the nation" was the final public speech of Dwight D. Eisenhower as the 34th President of the United States, delivered in a television broadcast on January 17, 1961.
Perhaps best known for advocating that the nation guard against the potential influence of the military–industrial complex, a term he is credited with coining, the speech also expressed concerns about planning for the future and the dangers of massive spending, especially deficit spending, the prospect of the domination of science through Federal funding and, conversely, the domination of science-based public policy by what he called a "scientific-technological elite".
Words of wisdom and prophecy for today perhaps, but we have been ruled by the insane for a very long time. John Lennon had the insight into the mechanisms of our rule given his wealth. Crucially he also had the knowledge and forethought to educate people of our reality.
If only people could wake up...
COMMON LAW LINKS:
Common Law in 10 minutes - https://www.bitchute.com/video/AgZYTwDm1giy/
Learn Common Law here - http://knowledgeispower-uk.weebly.com/
STRAWMAN - The Best UK Common Law Documentary You Will Ever See -
https://odysee.com/@TruthWillOut:8/Strawman-uk-common-law:c
Article - Meet Your Strawman - https://www.ruralmoney.com/meet-your-strawman/
Common Law Court - Register the living, breathing you today - https://www.commonlawcourt.com/
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny interviews Prof. Dolores Cahill of the World Freedom Alliance who gives updates on current WFA ventures and details the following...
-Formation of the World Freedom Alliance and Freedom Airways
-Long term plan for the global population - put in place by Agenda 21, Agenda 2030 and the 17 Sustainable Goals
-Why the vaccine is NOT a vaccine
-Educating police on their unlawful police activity
-Why the Nuremberg Trials need to be repeated and updated ...and much more!
Professor Cahill has a very specific CALL TO ACTION that everyone can follow.
Listen carefully.
Should we have the right to refuse blood transfusion from the vaccinated for COVID-19 ?
People who are vaccinated for COVID-19 can donate blood immediately or shortly after being vaccinated despite the fact that the experimental product may induce life-threatening disorders in the recipients.
The Mirror Project - MP-22.com
**The Nuremberg Code (1947)**
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.