Yesterday, a Japanese Professor, Kaoru Yamaguchi, came across my information on how the Fed silences an honest evaluation of the debt money system by academics in the U.S. The way the Fed silences critics is by controlling the American economics journals. How? They fill their editorial boards with former Fed employees, or wanna-be employees. This makes it impossible for a professor with a monetary reform perspective to be published, and professors have to publish to be able to keep their jobs. According to Professor Yamaguchi: “Now it has become clear, with high probability, why I was expelled from the academic profession as the professor at the Graduate School of Business, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan, a year and half after my US Congressional Briefing, July 20, 2011, (invited by the former Congressman Dennis Kucinich) in which I presented … results that strongly support the Chicago Plan. I’m afraid the [Bank of Japan] has been exerting similar controls over Japanese economists.” So, what is at the root of the Fed’s deception and how do we fix it? The deceptions begin with the way the Fed categorizes itself – as a "quasi-governmental organization". They want to be a federal government organization to protect themselves from lawsuits. But they want to be a private organization to protect themselves from effective oversight of the U.S. Congress, claiming the Fed must maintain independence from politicians who would usurp the powers of the Fed for their own political purposes. Ironically, it is clear that the Fed's independence from the political class does not -- in fact -- serve the public interest, but only the interests of the biggest banks. In 2008, Congress investigated the causes of the 2007-2008 financial meltdown. They discovered that the biggest banks paid little attention to one of the Fed's primary control "levers", the reserve requirement ratio. They found out that JP Morgan and Citi, instead of being leveraged 9-to-1, were actually leveraged 52-to-1. In other words, these banks were illegally creating money to benefit their own profit-making interests. So what this boils down to is whether one believes in true representative governance where the will of the people reigns supreme. In the existing debt money system, the Fed is disguised as the representative of the common good, when demonstrably, it is not. The Fed is, in reality, merely a metaphorical curtain disguising the real power of Wizard -- the plundering of America by the biggest banks by out-of-control counterfeiting of the money supply. The result: the United States has become -- at least from a monetary perspective -- ruled by a hidden oligarchy. The voters sense that the ship of state is not responding to their commands, but cannot seem to identify the source of the problem. The cure for al this is a return to a sovereign money system -- as Joseph Huber so correctly points out - a "state money" system. This is a system not run by the banks and for the banks, but run by a Monetary Authority that actually operates independently, and in the public interest. However, the road to monetary reform is filled with "rabbit trails" and booby traps. The two most popular of these false solutions are a return to gold-backed money, and auditing the Fed. A return to gold money – even if it wasn’t totally impractical – would only guarantee centralized control of the money supply, as any “scarce-money solution” would do. It would be grand for the gold dealers and gold hoarders, but a disaster for the rest of us. Auditing the Fed sounds good, but after years of bookkeeping investigations – no matter what was uncovered -- would we be one inch closer to the root of the problem? No! Many years, if not decades could be wasted pursuing either of these false solutions -- ultimately to no good effect. The root of the problem is the bank money system – counterfeiting by the banks. And what insures the continuation of this system better than allowing the banks to lend this counterfeit money out to the government in the form of a national debt? History will look back on this craziness and wonder why we couldn’t have seen it sooner. To keep myself on track, I look to two guide stars in the otherwise confusing firmament of monetary reform: 1. It's not what backs the money that is important; it's who controls its quantity. Currently the biggest banks are clearly in control of the quantity, because most money is counterfeited – that is, created out of nothing -- then lent out as additional debt. However, a return to state money can never be sustained -- no matter how arduous the battle to attain it -- without step #2. 2. No more national debt! As long as the sovereign is allowed to borrow, we would remain in the bank money system. And eventually the big-banking class will seize effective control over the political class once again – if it ever really gave it up. Why would the state borrow when the state can create?

To become Partner #537: www.billstill.com, then Click "Subscribe”. Bitcoin address: 15Ucde9jSR7UezG8w4Lgk3jMhiCebc4veG

Visit our website now: http://www.billstill.com - considered by informed insiders’ as THE ultimate resource for fixing the National Debt problem and surviving Economic or Financial Collapse/Crash and attaining the unvarnished truth about Washington and today’s United States Political Climate. Good evening, I’m still reporting on Jill Stein Would Choose Donald Trump Over Crooked Hillary Clinton Good afternoon, I’m still reporting on Jill Stein. Green Party Presidential candidate, Jill Stein says that she would support Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton. Stein told a CNBC call-in show last week that Clinton is much more likely to ignite a war with Russia that could turn into a nuclear exchange. However, Trump proposes to have a legitimate reset and normalization in relations between the U.S. and Russia. Stein makes some really good – and surprising – points in this 2-minute clip. First she points out something that was news to me – that Obama has actually exploded air pollution during his two terms. [insert] However, Stein then wanders into an area where she does not know the facts – the capabilities of our nuclear ICBM strike force. [insert] Wrong! Our ballistic missiles are NOT on a hair-trigger alert. In fact, the entire system is designed from the ground up to NOT to have what’s called “launch-on-warning” capability, despite what some have said in the media. Launch-on-warning means that as soon as the North American Air Defense Command spots a ballistic missile attack, they would have approximately 15 minutes to launch a nuclear counterstrike before the first incoming missiles – no-doubt aimed at our ICBMs – would strike the first blow. Our ballistic nuclear capability is designed to be able to withstand a nuclear first-strike, and still have enough survive to be able to deliver a fatal retaliatory blow to any aggressor. US nuclear-tipped missiles are not easy to launch. The system is designed that way to prevent the worst-case scenario of some idiot president accidentally triggering an all-out nuclear war. And the President does not carry around the so-called nuclear codes in his pocket. The President always has a military officer nearby carrying the so-called “football”. It’s called the football because the president’s role is just one link in a command chain. He or she cannot give a launch command by him or herself. So, they are not on a hair trigger, and saying so promotes an unnecessary fear in the populace that we are just inches from doomsday at any given time. This may serve your political purposes, but it is not correct and you should stop using it. [insert: “Mikhail Gorbachev said…”] This is wrong also, despite what Mikhail Gorbachev may have said. You were only 12 when the Cuban Missile Crisis hit, and so perhaps you were sheltered from the pivotal danger which culminated on Oct. 22, 1962, when President Kennedy addressed the nation on television. Thereafter, a significant fraction of the U.S. population became so fearful of nuclear war that they dug fallout shelters in their back yards. But now, the most interesting part of Stein’s segment: [insert] I’m still reporting from Washington. Good Day. Bill Still is a former newspaper editor and publisher. He has written for USA Today, The Saturday Evening Post, the Los Angeles Times Syndicate, OMNI magazine, and has also produced the syndicated radio program, Health News. He has written 22 books and two documentary videos and is the host of his wildly popular daily YouTube Channel the “Still Report”, the quintessential report on the economy and Washington. Connect with Bill Still: https://www.facebook.com/BillStillOfficial https://twitter.com/billstill?lang=en https://www.youtube.com/user/bstill3/videos https://plus.google.com/u/0/109353617116072656672 Consider becoming a cherished sponsor: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=3204630 https://youtu.be/rwdPrbrbFLI

Now, the news: President Obama warned us 5 days before the 2008 election what he was up to: [insert] If part of that plan is flying in unvetted Muslims and distributing them by the bus-load in the middle of the night across America, where is he putting them? Well, this morning, WorldNetDaily may have provided the answer – and the answer is something called “forced diversity.” According to reporter Bob Unruh: “The Housing Authority of Baltimore City is secretly relocating Section 8 subsidized housing families from the inner city into suburban homes….” That frees up room for incoming Syrian immigrants who are used to living at a much lower standard of living. We’ve already seen the effects in Paris, Brussels and other European capitals – solid apartment blocks of muslim immigrants, impermeable to outsiders or police. This may be what New Jersey governor Chris Christie complained about on Bill O’Reilly’s show last week: [insert Christie] In Baltimore, $12 million has been spent buying suburban homes and $50 million has been spent in renting them in pricey neighborhoods. According to Jesse Lee Peterson, author of the new book, “The Antidote”, they are: “…destroying every suburb that they move into, just as they’ve done to the inner cities. This is ‘forced diversity.’” The lefties claim that diversity is a good thing, but diversity actually hides another agenda --changing the basic voting patterns of America. According to WND: “The inner cities, with their heavily government-dependent populations, already reliably vote Democrat.” “… new regulations imposed by the Obama administration in July 2013 [allows] the federal government to force communities to provide more “affordable housing” in exchange for grants from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).” In other words, we are paying – thru hidden government programs – for our own destruction – a totalitarian socialist system – one too weak to resist a totalitarian terrorist system disguised as a religion of peaceful intentions. According to Jesse Lee Peterson, author of the new book, “The Antidote”: “The Obama administration is now redistributing poor inner city families to American suburbs. And you aren’t supposed to know about it. Just like we don’t know what they did with those illegal alien children that came across the borders, and they put them into communities in the wee hours of the night.” Peterson argues that without moral and spiritual change: “HUD is simply subsidizing and spreading dysfunction around the country rather than actually helping anyone.” According to another WND columinist, Jack Cashill, Section 8 housing: “… encourages people to cheat and most do …. It discourages marriage.” “Since rent is based on reported income, why keep the man of the house on the books.?” “Section 8 housing essentially subsidizes degeneracy and encourages the destruction of neighborhoods.” In other words Section 8 for the suburbs strikes at the success of the American middle class – the incentive-driven system – work harder, get more of the benefits. Colin Flaherty, a reporter who frequently covers black violence, says the new regulations for Section 8 for the suburbs ruins formerly prosperous neighborhoods on the one hand while it casts in stone a culture of government dependency. “Children from Section 8 housing don’t just overload schools, they overload schools with children with less interest in learning, less interest in behaving in class rooms. Less interest in listening to teachers. And greater tendencies for violence, drugs and defiance.” “This is not theory. This is the experience of every neighborhood that has suffered Section 8 housing being inserted into their community.” According to Cashill: “Neighbors have the right, indeed the obligation, to protest the willful sabotage of their community.” I’m still reporting from the nation’s capitol. Good day.