Good part starts @2:05. Bill Gates says, talking about Trump (sans the aaaaaahs): "The second time I saw him was the March after that, so March 2017 in the white house. In both of those two meetings he asked me if vaccines weren't a bad thing. Because he was considering a commission to look into ill effect of vaccines. And somebody, his name was Robert Kennedy jr., was advising him that vaccines were causing bad things. And I said, no, that's a dead end, that would be a bad thing, don't do that."
Some of the talking points:
- the long term perspective
- war of attrition
- dehumanisation
- supply chain breakdowns
- worker and worker output shortages
- price manipulations and controls
- preparation and sovereignty
Here's how EU bureaucracy does it.
TLDR: for a region to be marked as red, it is sufficient to have 50 cases per 100.000 with 3% positivity rate. Meaining, if some 1,67% of the population are tested, and 0,05% are "positive", the reagion is marked as "red", triggering human freedom violations region wide.
> To ensure that the process is manageable and transparent, the proposal focuses on three criteria, namely the 14-day cumulative COVID-19 case notification rate, test positivity rate, and the testing rate. These criteria should then be applied to the different areas, ideally Member States’ regions. **Only areas with a testing rate of more than 250 COVID-19 tests per 100 000** population should be assessed according to these criteria, to ensure that sufficiently robust data is available.
>
> Using these criteria, restrictions could be applied, if at all, to regions with a **14-day cumulative COVID-19 case notification of 50 or more and a test positivity rate of 3% or more**. Restrictions could be applied to regions where the 14-day cumulative COVID-19 case notification rate is more than 150 per 100 000 population even if the test positivity rate is below 3%. The criteria and thresholds outlined are based on extensive discussions with and data made available by Member States.
>
> Using data provided by the Member States, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) will produce regularly updated maps, broken down by regions, that would indicate whether the thresholds outlined above are reached in a given area.
>
> Where neither the threshold for the 14-day cumulative COVID-19 case notification nor the threshold for the test positivity rate is reached, the region should be marked as ‘green’. **Where only one of the thresholds is reached, the regions should be marked as ‘orange’. Where both thresholds are reached, the region should be marked as ‘red’**. Where insufficient data is available or the testing rate is not met, the region should be marked as ‘grey’.
This video is being scrubbed from the web so I wanted to make sure it's here for posterity.
Basically, the liar doctor is ignoring the logic behind the effect of having a far greater number of "infected" on the death rate. She is doing so because the implication is extremely damaging to their precious narrative.
Andrew Kaufman discusses the details of the difficult to publish Danish study that has been carried on on a bit over 6000 participants, yielding a highly unpopular deliberation regarding the mask effectiveness in a general settings it's being employed currently and worldwide.
If you can't believe your ears, can you believe your eyes? Here's a transcript.
"Again, a good question. And what is now, sort of, evolving, into a bit of a standard. That, if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more, that the chances of it being replication competent are minuscule. So that somebody... and, you know, we do, we have patients, and it's very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians. Somebody comes in and they repeat their PCR and it's like 37 cycle threshold. But you never, you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. So I think if, somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you gotta say, you know it's just, it's just dead nucleotides, period."