Next in Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH_j-_VQK4s Bernie Sanders Voting Record Defense: https://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/27110/bernie-sanders/22/defense#.VkfEwnarT-d Hillary Clinton http://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/55463/hillary-clinton/22/defense#.VkgjoHarT-d American Smart Power at its best We have the highest human development index indicators in Africa So what we’re going to kill you. Long Life Free Higher Education Low poverty Low inequality Universal health care Decentralized village govt Low violent crime rate (1/3 of US) now 3 to 10 times more violent than US Sources: indictment of Clinton 14 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnN9TQw1AZA Clinton hawk on Ukraine? Iraq – Syria – Libya Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy world views & What is to be done? There are many issues to tackle: Climate Change War Concentration of wealth and the fight for an economy that serves all. Equal opportunity. Oligarchy – and the enserfdom of the individual – through losing power in negotiation. Markets will not serve the people if they have no bargaining power Using modern communications to empower citizens of the world to transform politics so that the people do have control of their government, so that agencies do not become captive. In an age of unlimited communications and computing power – the 18th century mode of “delegating political power”. What we need is a political direct democracy online platform where real laws are really made. We need to get the great passionate thinkers on the left, like Noam Chomsky, and the great passionate thinkers on the right, like Ron Paul, to be able to envision a common future, where initially neither get everything they want but they advance an agenda for the common good. Now these two men may never see eye to eye – but the point should be understood. The libertarian, the mind your own business early 20th century Republicans, the anarcho syndicalist of the occupy movement, the bleeding heart liberal. Could we not instead of having debates, have dialogues. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0mV3oV7Ck8

00:00 Bernie Sanders on 14th amendment ability to regulate debt by exec 00:27 Somalia 01:15 Bombing of Libyan TV Press Conference w director of libyan english television announced 3 journalists were killed in the targeting of 3 satellite dishes by NATO to silence Gaddafi's mass media instruments 01:59 SYRIA Editorial hat: the latest incompetent move on NATO's part in the author's opinion - as a taxpayer funding this mess The turning of the tide: the media begins to report in earnest information that does not tow the official line NY Times The Libya Campaign LA Times still towing line Younnes Assassination still causing reeling Category: News & Politics Tags: ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Y0KyrbATFE

Benghazi Gate http://douthat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/24/100000-libyan-casualties/ Director National Intelligence Clapper. Who made the decision to alter the truth to suit political appearance? Tail wagging the dog. Was the US Government disinformed by a media eager to oust Gadaffi as a bloodsport, with plenty of loot. The Media and The Military companies are owned by many of the same interests. In the case of the NYT the hawkishness comes from its ties to pro Israeli elements perhaps. The French and British press, all seemed eager to repeat stories that in the rush to intervene were not fact checked. Did the US NSC have the real info: Talking Points: http://libertycrier.com/government/ben-swann-petraeus-allen-gaouette-ham-the-benghazi-story-the-media-isnt-telling-you/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_National_Security_Council#Membership http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162-57552328/sources-office-of-the-dni-cut-al-qaeda-reference-from-benghazi-talking-points-and-cia-fbi-signed-off/ http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/nov/20/iraq-afghanistan-daqduq-indefinite-detention All of this over 4 american lives vs. the 10s of thousands allready lost Who made the decision to ignore the truth When it Destabilized Africa, releasing weapons and displaced armed groups, and greatly strengthened reactionary armed militants, and militarizing what might have been resolved through dialog Who made the decision to have the press run with many horror studies about the 1969 Revolution Libyan Government led by Mouammar Gadaffi which turned out to be untrue? - Viagra Rape - Heavy Weapons Use On Civilians - Intervene to prevent a non existent massacre, using Gadaffi's own bluster to justify their actions. - Arm and train reactionary religious militants, the very same people who pointed their weapons on the US Ambassador. Why were US officials attacked by the people they armed? Isn't that actually the most important question. What is the truth? Then who made the decision to commit fraud on the people of the world by confusing and distorting the facts - Why are 4 major military figures having their careers halted Petraeus, Allen, Ham. Why is Obama purging these people? Petraeus was exhibiting hostility prior to the election. Additionaly Bob Gates resigned and was reportedly opposed to the Libya intervention as it was conducted. The gamble was on putting a wedge between Tunisia And Egypt in the Arab Spring. But what of the general trend of arming Sunni Wahabi Salafist Groups in Libya and Syria, after selling 80 billion dollars in arms to Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Qatar has become the king maker. Every aspect of the peace keeping resolution was turned into a war making resolution. Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton -- both definitely knowingly lied -- Clinton in refusing real dialog -- by demanding he stop killing his own people, and Rice by claiming 10's of thousands of lives were threatened. - Why did Americans arm Religious Zealots - Why did Americans maintain lax security -- when the "love" between Wahabi Salafists and the US Govt in Libya and Syria -- clearly could not fix the damage done by in particular the treatment of Palestinians since the 1960s by the US, Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, Iraq and drone strikes. - What were they thinking, attacks against even the Red Cross occurred in Benghazi, the Islamic Caliphate flag hoisted over the revolutions hq at the courthouse in Benghazi. - Why did Ansar Al Sharia and cohorts attack the Americans who had armed them. Did they feel that they had gotten what they wanted out of the Americans, and now could give the Americans what they wanted once Gadaffi was out of the way. - Should we not hold our Government accountable. - The problems is any peaceful congresspeople will provide cover to the Administration -- which up until now -- have run an aggressive neo-con strategy lauded by some of the most sinister figures from the Bush administration. And the conservatives basically support this permanent warfare security state. But if you have a voice -- demand that the investigation go back to the outbreak -- you can use the argument -- why did we arm Religious Extremists in Libya, known to be sympathetic to the people we are torturing waterboarding and bombing all over the world. We are reluctant to call them Al Qaeda. But the former LIFG leader Abu Yahya Al Libi was assassinated by the US just days before the attack. Every military intervention seems to start with a lie, The Spanish American War, The Gulf Of Tonkin, The Iraq War, the war on terror, all are designed to benefit certain people at the expense of the vast majority of the citizens, and even more so the citizens of the targeted countries. http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=55640 http://futurechallenges.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/arab-spring-map.jpg ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c9whFE1gk0

The Hunting Down, Mass Arrest and Mass Torture Of Loyalists in Libya - are 100 percent engineered by NATO Leadership. Nuremberg style prosecutions should be conducted of the entire NATO Political and Military Leadership for genocide השואה... לעולם לא עוד ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqGQVW1oOJI