As Second Thought asks 'Is the State Your Enemy?' I covered much of his erroneous argument in the first part as Second Thought doesn't understand the state, his assumption that the role of the government is somehow to be the provider, but is deluded to believe that the state will be subservient under any form of collectivism. In this second part I address more on the argument for why the state will not serve you and the differences between promises politicians make to that of what economic reality will allow. Second Thought likes to claim to be 'altruistic' and as always, no different to the Left claiming to be champions of the poor, everything moral. I also address on the argument on the Scandinavian economies which time and time again are misrepresented by the political Left, especially when it comes to healthcare and the happiness index. One must remember that what he's calling out for here is a far cry from his other videos shouting to overthrow the private sector and usher in full-blown socialism. It shows the logical fallacy of the Left, the inconsistencies and contradictions, it is why they will never have a credible argument because economics and history is not on their side. The history of governments have shown to abuse the rights of the people. Just about the only thing I agree with Second Thought upon is the unjust wars through wasting money on war intervention overseas when money could be put to better use. Second Thought seems to believe morality and altruism is theft and coercion, forcing society into a collective group to pay for others and literally spying on how and what other people spend their money on. This is the biggest reason socialism is so deeply flawed, not only is it a disastrous failure, it really does sum up the Orwellian nightmare. Any normal decent person will value their privacy, therefore, their liberty. If you haven't seen the first part video, you can check that out here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFn6BnhTrwI Lobbying: (0:00) Economic Reality: (0:48) Consequences: (1:22) A Concession: (1:37) Forced Altruism: (2:17) The Enemy: (4:08) Incentives: (4:27) Socialism is Totalitarian: (4:41) Collectivism: (5:10) Peoples Interests: (5:47) Trying to Control: (6:24) Funding Contradiction: (6:40) Economic Calculation Problem: (7:09) Human Rights: (7:32) Happiness Report: (8:32) Scandinavian Socialism Myth: (10:08) Big Pharma: (12:31) Libertarianism Vindicated: (12:58) Free Stuff: (13:22) U.S. Education: (13:47) Transparancy Dealings: (14:01) Guaranteed Theft: (14:48) Living Like Kings: (14:58) 'Real' Altruists: (15:20) *Follow Me on Social Media:* • Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LibertarianViewsScottyM • Parler: https://parler.com/profile/LibertarianViewsScottyM/posts — @LibertarianViewsScottyM • Gab ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLc_QdKYwRU

As always, socialists love to project and make up baseless claims as they go along, Vaush being no exception to this as he persistently makes up nonsense about capitalism and even goes as far as to redefine the entire meaning of slavery. Funny enough, everything he describes relative to what isn't freedom just happens to apply to his own sick minded ideology, socialism in the real world. Freedom has nothing to do with slavery and as I've stated numerous times before, you cannot for the life of you take away the freedom of an individual to owning their own property, nor taking away their individual rights only then to pretend you stand for liberty. The fact Vaush goes as far as to completely negate the fact you have the freedom to up sticks and leave a company tells you everything. His argument that the business owner has total control ignores the fact it is his private business, that's a bit like walking into someone's house and trying to dictate to them in their own house how they should live or what you can do. As usual, no concept of private ownership. Also, without private property rights it is impossible to have personal ownership of possessions, it's the private property rights that outline and define what you own, a fact socialists seem to think they can bend to redefine the entire meaning of socialism because they know that to concede to communal ownership and central planning is the indefensible. You cannot on one hand claim you stand for liberty, only then to try and control people and try to take away their freedom of their own rights and what they can or cannot own. Even his argument of positive freedom is erroneous, collectivism is a contradiction of everything freedom stands for, the attempt to try and create the equality he dreams of ends up creating the opposite, but more importantly requires control which is the antithesis of liberty. *Follow Me on Social Media:* • Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LibertarianViewsScottyM • Twitter: https://twitter.com/ScottCJMcKelvie • Parler: https://parler.com/#/user/LibertarianViewsScottyM • Gab: https://gab.com/LibertarianScot • Minds: https://www.minds.com/LibertarianScot/ • MeWe: https://mewe.com/i/scottmckelvie • WordPress Blog: https://libertarianviewswithscottym.wordpress.com/ • LBRY/Odysee: https://odysee.com/@LibertarianViewsScottyM:6 • Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-390494 • BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/egfCIS1DbaBM/ *You can also support me here on Patreon:* https://www.patreon.com/LibertarianViewsScottyM ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuImxqfTiKI

Supply and Demand is something important to understand when it comes to prices in the market as the supply and demand curve is what determines prices. The law of demand is not something that we can choose to ignore and when it comes to Socialists they seem to think they can, this specific Socialist (Communist) I debunked on Supply and Demand is a boy called RedScare TV on YouTube. The law of demand tells us that a lack of supply with increased demand will lead to higher costs; likewise the increased supply of goods leads to lower demand thus lower costs. Someone trying to ignore the law of demand is like ignoring the law of physics which is not something we can do, you can't walk off a cliff and expect to float or go up the way. Supply and Demand relates to many things and in the example I give in this example is pretty clear that from the increased production of the cars, the more there is to go around therefore the lower the costs. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okQWOn4zJSE

Education today is so heavily ruled by the state that I feel independent learning is something vastly important. It is important that with the education system heavily ruled by the state for kids to have an independent mind and to question everything with which they learn. In this video, I give my own example on education and my thoughts of independent learning. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9WFn7Re60k