Credit goes to Fall of Civilizations. https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/fall-of-civilizations-podcast-paul-cooper-xPbvXZfU9Wa/#podcast

Credit goes to AltHype. Sources: 1. Reviewer Bias, Annals of Internal Medicine: http://sci-hub.tw/10.7326/0003-4819-116-11-958_2 2. Peer Review and Editorial Decision Making: http://sci-hub.tw/10.1192/bjp.173.2.110 3. Effect of Institutional Prestige on Reviewer's Recommendations and Editorial Decisions: http://sci-hub.tw/10.1001/jama.1994.03520020063017 4. Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/202669 5. Double-Blind Peer Review Failure Rate: https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1164/rccm.201711-2257LE https://blogs.plos.org/absolutely-maybe/2017/10/31/the-fractured-logic-of-blinded-peer-review-in-journals/ 6. Are Road Safety Evaluation Studies Published in Peer Reviewed Journals More Valid than Similar Studies not Published in Peer Reviewd Journals: http://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00068-7 7. A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multileval Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0014331 8. Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037/full 9. Confirmational Response Bias Among Social Work Journals: http://sci-hub.tw/10.1177/016224399001500102 10. Testing for the Presence of Positive-Outcome Bias in Peer Review: http://sci-hub.tw/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.406 11. What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2586872/ 12. Retracted Science and the Retraction Index https://iai.asm.org/content/79/10/3855.full 13. Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review https://www.pnas.org/content/114/48/12708

Credit goes to History of Philosophy.