LBRY Block Explorer

LBRY Claims • the-history-of-the-n-t-church-age-33

011380167498bca43ed45729b49e3aa092bff937

Published By
Created On
24 Apr 2024 10:11:42 UTC
Transaction ID
Cost
Safe for Work
Free
Yes
The History of the N T Church age Part 90
The early Bible Battles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
We must state a truth, early in the existence of the churches, not every church had all 27 books. But don't believe the lie that the early churches did not have the New Testament.

There were many books that were disputed among early churches as whether or not they were inspired scriptures. Some of these books include 2 Peter, 2 & 3 John, Jude, and sometimes Hebrews and James.

Historians love to argue that certain churches did not accept certain books, that certain churches had 20 books, and that another would have 22 books. Again, the need here is to be logical and reasonable in thinking.

1. Oftentimes these letters were written to individual people. It would clearly take much longer for a letter of that sort to come to the surface and begin its copy and circulation. Just look at a map in your Bibles and see how far apart the churches were to each other and you can see why this is true.

2. Keep in mind that it takes time for letters to circulate. A letter that James wrote to "the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad," would certainly take a reasonable amount of time to get around. Indeed more time than a letter written directly to the church at Ephesus.

3. Another reason some of these books are often disputed is because of their length. Among these are the three shortest books of the New Testament.

These were a few of the things that kept certain of the churches from recognizing these books early on. But that did not stop them from ultimately being recognized by the Lord's churches as part of the New Testament. (from Why KJV?, by Phillip Thomas)

Here comes the false church
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
In studying the history of the Churches and the word of God, you will run into the church's gravest enemies: The Roman Catholic Church. Even though she was not in existence for the first 300 years, Catholics will lead you to believe that they go all the way back and that they had a hand in all of this.

The Roman Catholic Church loves to grab the credit for our Bible. She loves to take credit for deciding which books belong in there, and she loves to consider herself right in the thick of the early church age.

Always remember that the Roman Catholic Church was not in existence when the Lord's churches were busy collecting, copying, and circulating. The Roman Catholic Church believes that she is in control over what is included in the Bible, and believes that she devised the canon from its beginning.

Keep in mind, Peter was not the first pope, Catholicism would not exist for a few hundred more years, and by the time she came around, the canon was complete. (from Why KJV?, by Phillip Thomas)

We have Testimonies of Early Church Leaders
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Php 4:2  I beseech Euodias, and beseech Syntyche, that they be of the same mind in the Lord. 
Php 4:3  And I intreat thee also, true yokefellow, help those women which laboured with me in the gospel, with Clement also, and with other my fellowlabourers, whose names are in the book of life. 

Clement is believed by some to have been a bishop at Rome. Not only that, he was indeed a close associate of Paul. After Paul's death, Clement wrote a letter to the church at Corinth. This was an inspired document, yet the church at Corinth kept this letter. And today you can read a translated copy of that letter.

I mention that because in that letter, written around 100AD Clement makes reference to a certain number of books: Titus, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Matthew, Luke, James, 2 Peter, Hebrews, and Romans.

In 170AD a man named Tatian wrote the "Diatessaron". It's what we would call a "Harmony of the Gospels". It included 4 and only 4 gospels, the ones that we recognize in our Bibles today.

Collectively the Gospels and the epistles of Paul were the first to be universally recognized and were so during the first one hundred years after they were finished.

Ignatius (30-107AD), Polycarp (65-155AD), and Papias (70-155AD) Cite verses from every New Testament book except for 2 and 3 John. Look at those dates.

Justin Martyr (110-165AD) Cited verses from Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Acts, Romans, 1 Corinthians, Galations, 2 Thessalonians, Hebrews, 1 and 2 Peter, and Revelation.

Irenaeus (120-202AD) Wrote a five volume work called "Against Heresies". He quoted from the New Testament books over 1200 times and quoted from every book of our Bible, but for 3 John.

Around 140AD a man named Marcion came along and promoted his canon. It included only 10 of Paul's letters and the book of Luke. And everywhere that you read about Marcion you read the word "heretic". The early churches recognized him as a heretic because of the lies he spread in regards of what to include in the Bible.
...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rj0hbmqcsz8
Author
Content Type
Unspecified
video/mp4
Language
English
Open in LBRY

More from the publisher

Controlling
VIDEO
THE H
Controlling
VIDEO
THERE
Controlling
VIDEO
1 COR
Controlling
VIDEO
THE H
Controlling
VIDEO
THERE
Controlling
VIDEO
1 COR
Controlling
VIDEO
THE H
Controlling
VIDEO
THERE
Controlling
VIDEO
THE H